| 
        
        
          |  |  
          | 
              
              
                | 
                    
                    
                      | 
                          
                          
                            |   Dear 
                              Subscriber,     Our story #1 is so 
                              spectacular that it is being submitted 
                              to New Scientist magazine in the 
                              hopes that it is sufficiently newsworthy to their 
                              readership as well. We had two breakthroughs 
                              presented at SPESIF 2012 which also directly 
                              relate to available IRI publications. The first 
                              was the presentation by Dr. Moddel 
                              proving zero-point energy 
                              emission from gases in Casimir cavities. 
                              (See related story #4 showing light emission from 
                              zero-point energy dynamic Casimir cavities 
                              from New Scientist). The second was 
                              the breakthrough announcement from Mike Gamble 
                              that Boeing has been using inertial 
                              propulsion for moving satellites for 
                              years, which confirms our long-term IRI advocacy 
                              (with multiple inertial propulsion reports) when 
                              no other school or institution in the country 
                              recognized its value! 
                              It is a direct impact on 
                              the energy costs for space to have private 
                              industry find a less expensive fee for access to 
                              space low earth orbit (LEO). That is story #2 
                              on SpaceX courtesy of Dr. Paul 
                              Werbos from NSF, who also graciously gave SPESIF 
                              2012 a wonderful remote presentation through 
                              webcast (see www.futurenergy.org for 
                              online video). IRI could not have 
                              written a better story #3 than to report a 
                              discovery of something exceeding 100% 
                              efficiency in energy. Thanks to a 
                              heads-up from one of our readers, this summary of 
                              a Physical Review Letters journal 
                              article is the real thing we hope for to signal a 
                              new energy source emergence. Though apologies are 
                              given in the article for the low level of light 
                              that seems to be related to the anomaly, still the 
                              nature of the energy source that provides the 
                              boost needs to be considered for such a 2X energy 
                              output vs. input. Of course, based on our 
                              concurrent stories (#1 and #4), it is likely that 
                              there is a quantum vacuum 
                              explanation.  With story #5 
                              presenting the latest ARPA-E call for 
                              transformational energy technologies, it may be a 
                              good place for cavitation 
                              fusion or sonofusion inventors to seek 
                              funding. IRI attempted to arrange a second 
                              cavitation fusion presentation for next month but 
                              was cancelled by the scheduled presenter after all 
                              the arrangements were made. We hope our IRI 
                              members who responded are not too inconvenienced 
                              by the change of plans. Instead, you can see a 
                              short interview with our first cavitation fusion 
                              interview with one of the world's experts from 
                              SPESIF 2011, Dr. Max Formichev-Zamilov from Penn 
                              State University on the new IRI release DVD, 
                              "Breakthrough Developments 
                              in Energy and Propulsion" (see ad at 
                              bottom of FE eNews), along with four other amazing 
                              scientist interviews from the same SPESIF 
                              conference, thanks to reporter Matt 
                              Baird. Thomas Valone, 
                              PhD,PE    Editor  
                                www.IntegrityResearchInstitute.org        |  |  |  |  
                | 
                    
                    
                      | 
                          
                          
                            | 1) 
                              Breakthrough 
                              Energy Technologies Presented at SPESIF 
                              2012 |  
                            | 
                              
                              
                              
                              back to table of 
                              contents
                                Integrity Research 
                              Institute, Press Release, March 26, 2012, www.futurenergy.org The 
                              recent Space, 
                              Propulsion & Energy Sciences International 
                              Forum 
                              (SPESIF) held at the University of Maryland's 
                              Riggs Alumni Center on February 29 - March 2, 2012 
                              had amazing breakthrough technologies 
                              presented.  The 
                              opening night featured two presentations on low 
                              energy nuclear reactions (LENR), 
                              including Dr. David Nagel from George Washington 
                              University on the science and business of LENR. 
                              The follow-up presentation remotely by Sterling 
                              Allan from New Energy Congress was proof that a 
                              breakthrough has occurred in this hotly contested 
                              field. Referring to his recent trip to Greece, 
                              Sterling reported on the Defkalion 
                              company's progress in producing a sustained heat 
                              output in the kilowatt range with a proprietary 
                              catalyst. The webcasted presentations are also 
                              online at www.futurenergy.org 
                              in an Adobe Connect format which launches 
                              automatically. There was some trouble with the 
                              March 1st 
                              presentations since a Mac was used for the first 
                              few of them but most of them over the three days 
                              include the PowerPoint slideshow and concurrent 
                              audio and video. 
 The 
                              best presentations of a true breakthrough the next 
                              day consisted of Dr. Garret Moddel from the 
                              University of Colorado and also Mike Gamble from 
                              Boeing. Garret discussed his experimental 
                              investigation into the zero-point 
                              energy emission from 
                              noble gases flowing through Casimir cavities, 
                              which is a test of his patent #7,379,286, 
                              coinvented with Dr. Bernard Haisch from Calphysics 
                              Institute. To their surprise, Helium had a more 
                              robust output of radiation in the microwatt range 
                              than the heavier Xenon, measured with a pyrometer. 
                              Their unusual theory of constricting a gas atom 
                              quantum mechanically and then looking for a 
                              release of energy actually worked, showing that 
                              zero-point energy can be utilized to produce 
                              energy!                
                              Of course the reabsorption of the lost energy from 
                              the quantum vacuum completes the engine cycle 
                              according to the patent disclosure, which also 
                              resembles the Josef Papp engine (patent 
                              #4,428,193) in many ways. Our institute expects a 
                              resurgence in the orders for the next edition of 
                              our book, Zero Point Energy: the Fuel of the 
                              Future, as a result of Dr. Moddel's 
                              experimental confirmation of a zero-point energy 
                              emission from a Casimir cavity. 
                                
                                
                                |  |  
                                | Boeing's Inertial Propulsion device 
                                used for years on their 
                                Satellites.  |  Mike 
                              Gamble's presentation was more tangible with an 
                              analysis of the Dean Drive style of inertial 
                              (mechanical) propulsion converted to 
                              electromagnetic equivalence. However, the 
                              breakthrough announcement came at the end as to 
                              the reason for his investigation: Boeing has been 
                              using a "scissoring gyroscope" style of inertial 
                              propulsion for satellite maneuvering for years! 
                              This confirmation of a controversial method of 
                              force production is a first for any major 
                              corporation. (IRI recommends our "Inertial Propulsion Patent 
                              Collection" and other related reports for 
                              those unacquainted with this simple but effective 
                              way to produce a unidirectional force.) Mike also 
                              mentioned that it was so old by now that Boeing 
                              didn't mind if he mentioned it to the public. He 
                              even let me photograph his pictures of the 
                              company's test model, which is quite large. 
                              It is now clear from Gamble's presentation 
                              that the physics and mechanical engineering 
                              textbooks need to be rewritten to include this 
                              amazing breakthrough, which has quietly ushered in 
                              an alternate method for force production, even in 
                              space, that can be solar-powered and electrically 
                              driven.    Several of the 
                              presentations included local talent as 
                              well: University of 
                               Maryland researchers 
                              Prof. Cui, Chiang, and Prof. Pomerantseva, a 
                              National Science Foundation senior scientist. Dr. 
                              Paul Werbos, a former FDA research scientist, Judy 
                              Kosovich,  a US DOE senior scientist Dave 
                              Goodwin, who was also the recipient of the "2012 
                              Integrity In Research Award" for his unique 
                              contributions to emerging energy science. The 
                              keynote address was by Dr. George Miley who has 
                              just completed his amazing autobiography which 
                              will be published by IRI in the fall. 
                               Outstanding presentations were also done by 
                              Osamu Ide, Don Reed, Charles Lundquist, 
                              Anthony Fresco, James Putnam, Clive Woods, 
                               Philip Bouchard, Hamilton 
                              Carter, and Robert DeBiase. All these 
                              presentations  were recorded and webcasted 
                               and are available at futurenergy.org free of charge to 
                              all.    We 
                              want to again thank our sponsors for generously 
                              supporting our conference: Arcos Cielos Research 
                              Center, Global Gateway Foundation, Ivan Kruglak 
                              and Marc Plotkin. We also want to thank all 
                               our volunteers:  Elaine Chen, 
                               Craig Fatzinger, Gerard VandenBerg and 
                              Hamilton Smith!  Your help is invaluable to 
                              us.  And last but not least, Thanks to all 
                              who attended and made this year SPESIF a great 
                              success!          |  
                          
                          
                            | 2) American Innovation: Race to 
                              Space |  
                            | From: global-energy- On Behalf 
                              Of Paul WerbosSent: Wednesday, 
                              March 21, 2012 9:21 AM
 To: Global 
                              Energy Network
   I highly 
                              recommend watching this relatively short 60 
                              Minutes segment in full:   SpaceX: Entrepreneur's 
                              race to space      The Administration 
                              deserves a lot of credit for a policy that is 
                              sparking this type of private sector 
                              innovation.   
                                
                                
                                |  |  
                                | IRI President at 
                                SPACEX exhibit on the National 
                                Mall. |    I have many friends who 
                              believe  that SpaceX will reduce the cost of 
                              access to space down to the $400/kg-LEO point 
                              where it seems likely that we can get energy from 
                              space at about the same generating cost per kwh as 
                              we can get form wind and solar, if we do the best 
                              we can with all three. This is very important, 
                              since the electric power market 
                              (worth about $2 trillion per year, if we assume 10 
                              cents per kwh) is made up of many market segments, 
                              some of which are best served by the steady 
                              24-hour power we can get from space, some of which 
                              are best served by the reliable day-time power we 
                              can get from solar farms sited in areas of 
                              reliable sun. Elon Musk, the guy behind 
                              SpaceX, is also behind Tesla, which has an 
                              interesting plan for an all-electric SUV at a 
                              price some might find interesting ($60,000 but 
                              saving about $2000 per year on fuel in the US 
                              compares not so badly with some other SUVs), and 
                              which mastered engines using zero rare earths 
                              before all its main competitors. So I hope they 
                              are right, but....
   I agree strongly with the 
                              Administration policy to encourage COTS. The 
                              primary credit (but certainly not all the credit) 
                              should go to Lori Garver at NASA, and to the 
                              relationship between Lori and Obama (the details 
                              of which I certainly do not know about). Lori was 
                              once Executive Director of the National Space 
                              Society, and I had a little bit of contact (all 
                              pleasant) with her in those old days. NSS was one 
                              of the groups which played an important role in 
                              advancing COTS, but there are other groups like 
                              the Space Frontier Foundation which I think are 
                              far more focused advocates specifically for that 
                              issue.  As I happen to be on the 
                              governing board of NSS this year, having known 
                              some of the key people for many decades, I have 
                              looked into this issue in great detail. (By the 
                              way, when I worked in Specter's office, I took the 
                              initiative to get a SpaceX briefing in the 
                              Senator's main conference room.)   BUT... there are really intense 
                              debates at times between the "new space COTS" 
                              movement" and the big stakeholder  Boeing/ Lockheed/etc 
                              group. Even within NSS. In my view, it is a 
                              microcosm of US politics in general. One group in 
                              power represents a positive psychology, a big step 
                              upwards from the past... but just not quite good 
                              enough for us to survive at all, unless certain 
                              changes are made. (By the way, I mean "survival" 
                              literally here.)  But the other group has 
                              often let itself be overwhelmed by negative and 
                              reactionary psychology, to the point where it can 
                              be even worse.     Having studied a bit of 
                              technical psychology (see my current paper in 
                              Neural Networks, a follow-on to my 2009 paper on 
                              the brain which won me the Hebb Award), I tend to 
                              think of this as kind of bipolar disorder, with 
                              one group suffering from too much traumatic 
                              negativity and another equally aberrated by 
                              euphoria and group spirit. But this year... I see 
                              some signs of some hope of mental recovery, as the 
                              new talking points of the Space Exploration 
                              Alliance (the big umbrealla group) seem more 
                              balanced and realistic than they were last year. 
                              But... it may or may not be good 
enough.   The fact is -- for all his 
                              positive spirit and enthusiasm and innovation... 
                              enthusiasm alone cannot keep a reusable rocket 
                              from melting as it comes back through the 
                              atmosphere.   SpaceX can beat today's 
                              Russian competition on price and quality when it 
                              comes to getting astronauts  to the International Space 
                              Station with expendable rockets. But to get to 
                              $400/kg-LEO, Musk knows one needs reusability. But 
                              right now, it looks a lot more likely that the 
                              Russians will get there than that we will.. ever. 
                              The problem is that we are at risk of losing 
                              crucial technology needed to get there, which is 
                              partly a matter of materials technology and partly 
                              a matter of hypersonics systems design technology. 
                              The issue of retirements in the aerospace  
                              industry (and of other critical engineering 
                              sectors) is far more serious than most people 
                              understand.     So if we have lots of 
                              enthusiasm but can't actually build anything... we 
                              end up dead. I have learned a lot about 
                              the current status of all this. I recently found 
                              out that while NASA  was throwing away so much 
                              money on heavy lift vehicle development designed 
                              to NOT use or  upgrade the key structural 
                              technologies, and while the AF X37B activity got 
                              hijacked by stakeholder politics,   DARPA quietly planned a 
                              kind of $300 million 10,000 pound global reach 
                              vehicle which would have   really plugged the hole, 
                              stopped the bleeding and put us even ahead of the 
                              past. (Except for maybe a few systems aspects that 
                              would be far less expensive, probably easy to fit 
                              in if people wanted to.) But... I 
                              guess  it was the outgoing 
                              director of DARPA... it sounded so threatening to 
                              some people, so was quietly shifted to 100 
                              pounds.   Nice and quiet, just like 
                               how we lost our most advanced missile 
                              interception technology just over the past few 
                              months.   Best of 
                              Luck,    Paul.   back to 
                              table of contents    |  
                          
                          
                            | 3) 
                              LED's Exceed 100% 
                              Efficiency |  
                            | 
                              March 5, 2012 by 
                              Lisa Zyga, 
                              PhysOrg.com   http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-03-efficiency.html   An LED's power 
                              conversion (wall-plug) efficiency varies inversely 
                              with its optical output power. Wall-plug 
                              efficiency can exceed 100%, the unity efficiency, 
                              at low applied voltages and high temperatures. 
                              Image credit: Santhanam, et al. ©2012 American 
                              Physical Society. 
   (PhysOrg.com) -- 
                              For the first time, researchers have demonstrated 
                              that an LED can emit more optical power than the 
                              electrical power it consumes. Although 
                              scientifically intriguing, the results won't 
                              immediately result in ultra-efficient commercial 
                              LEDs since the demonstration works only for LEDs 
                              with very low input power that produce very small 
                              amounts of light.The efficiency is around 230% 
                              according to calculations - Ed. 
                              Note   The researchers, Parthiban 
                              Santhanam and coauthors from MIT, have published 
                              their study in a recent issue of Physical 
                              Review Letters.  As the researchers explain 
                              in their study, the key to achieving a power conversionefficiency above 
                              100%, i.e., "unity efficiency," is to greatly 
                              decrease the applied voltage. According to their 
                              calculations, as the voltage is halved, the input 
                              power is decreased by a factor of 4, while the 
                              emitted light power scales linearly with voltage 
                              so that it's also only halved. In other words, an 
                              LED's efficiency increases as its output power 
                              decreases. (The inverse of this relationship - 
                              that LED efficiency decreases as its output power 
                              increases - is one of the bigest hurdles in 
                              designing bright, efficient LED 
                              lights.)  In their experiments, the 
                              researchers reduced the LED's input power to just 
                              30 picowatts and measured an output of 69 
                              picowatts of light - an efficiency of 230%. The 
                              physical mechanisms worked the same as with any 
                              LED: when excited by the applied voltage, 
                              electrons and holes have a certain probability of 
                              generating photons. The researchers didn't try to 
                              increase this probability, as some previous 
                              research has focused on, but instead took 
                              advantage of small amounts of excess heat to emit 
                              more power than consumed. This heat arises from 
                              vibrations in the device's atomic lattice, which 
                              occur due to entropy.  This light-emitting 
                              process cools the LED slightly, 
                              making it operate similar to a thermoelectric 
                              cooler. Although the cooling is insufficient to 
                              provide practical cooling at room temperature, it 
                              could potentially be used for designing lights 
                              that don't generate heat. When used as a heat 
                              pump, the device might be useful for solid-state 
                              cooling applications or even power 
                              generation. Theoretically, this 
                              low-voltage strategy allows for an arbitrarily 
                              efficient generation of photons at low voltages. 
                              For this reason, the researchers hope that the 
                              technique could offer a new way to test the limits 
                              of energy-efficiency electromagnetic 
                              communication.   More 
                              information: Parthiban Santhanam, et al. 
                              "Thermoelectrically Pumped Light-Emitting Diodes 
                              Operating above Unity Efficiency." Phys. 
                              Rev. Lett. 108, 09740  (2012).  DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.097403  Physics Synopsis |  
                          
                          
                            | 4) Harnessing the 
                              Quantum Power of Empty 
                              Space |  
                            | 
                              
                               by 
                              David Harris, New 
                              Scientist, February 20, 2012 
                               http://www.newscientist.com/artic  See 
                              introductory "What is Empty Space?" (3 
                              minute video) http://bcove.me/d3c6fmrh   The 
                              elusive Casimir effect suggests we could use 
                              vacuum energy to move objects and make stuff - but 
                              can something really come from 
                              nothing?    
                                            
                                            
                                            
                                            
                                            
                                      NOTHING 
                              will come of nothing." Shakespeare's 
                              epithet seems 
                              the kind of self-evident statement that only poets 
                              and philosophers would argue over. And physicists 
                              like Chris Wilson.     
                                   
                                            
                                            
                                            
                                      Last 
                              year, Wilson and his team at the Chalmers 
                              University of Technology 
                              in Gothenburg,Sweden, provided what seems a 
                              particularly egregious case of something for 
                              nothing. They claimed to have conjured up light 
                              from nowhere simply by squeezing down empty space 
                              (New Scientist, 19 
                              November 2011, p 16). 
                              That would be the latest manifestation of a 
                              quantum quirk known as the Casimir effect: the 
                              notion that a perfect vacuum, the very definition 
                              of nothingness in the physical world, contains a 
                              latent power that can be harnessed to move objects 
                              and make stuff.  
 Sightings of this 
                              vacuum action have been mounting over the past 
                              decade or so, leading some physicists to propose a 
                              new generation of nanoscale machines to take 
                              advantage of it, and others even to suggest a 
                              leading role for vacuum energy in determining the 
                              origin and fate of the cosmos. Others remain to be 
                              convinced. So what's the true story?  The idea that a 
                              vacuum is a seething sea of something can be 
                              traced back to the early decades of quantum 
                              physics. In the late 1920s, the German physicist 
                              Werner Heisenberg came up with his famous uncertainty 
                              principle, which says that some pairs of 
                              measurable quantities are intimately connected: 
                              the more you know about the one, the less you know 
                              about the other.   Energy and time 
                              are one such pair. That means you cannot measure 
                              the energy of a physical system with perfect 
                              precision unless time itself is completely 
                              imprecisely defined - that is, you take infinite 
                              time to perform your measurement. It follows that 
                              the zero-energy nothingness of the vacuum can 
                              never be pinned down precisely. According to 
                              quantum theory, even a perfect vacuum is filled 
                              with wave-like fields that fluctuate constantly, 
                              producing a legion of ephemeral particles that 
                              continually pop up out of nowhere only to 
                              disappear again, filling the vacuum with a 
                              distinct, non-zero "zero-point 
                              energy".    This recasting of the vacuum gave fresh 
                              impetus to the centuries-old debate about the 
                              nature of nothingness  (New Scientist, 19 
                              November 2011, p 50). But evidence also began 
                              to accumulate that the newly lively vacuum had 
                              practical effects. Observe atoms carefully enough 
                              and you see a tiny effect known as the Lamb shift, 
                              in which vacuum fluctuations jostle an orbiting 
                              electron, subtly altering its energy. Something 
                              similar can be invoked to explain how electrons 
                              sometimes spontaneously jump between two atomic 
                              energy states, giving off photons of 
                              light.   But Hendrik 
                              Casimir's suggestion was the most eye-catching. In 
                              1948, together with his colleague Dirk Polder, the 
                              Dutch physicist was trying to understand how 
                              colloids exist in a stable equilibrium. Colloids 
                              are mixtures in which one type of substance is 
                              dispersed through another, like fat globules in 
                              the watery solution of milk. Forces between the 
                              molecules in such a medium drop off more quickly 
                              with distance than basic calculations using the 
                              classical electromagnetic van der Waals force 
                              allow. It is as if something is pulling the 
                              constituent molecules closer together, giving the 
                              mixture extra stability.   Following a 
                              tip-off from the Danish quantum doyen Niels Bohr, 
                              Casimir calculated that this something could be 
                              vacuum action. Working out the effects of vacuum 
                              fluctuations in a colloid's complex molecular brew 
                              was impossibly involved. So Casimir considered a 
                              simple model system of two parallel metallic 
                              plates, and showed that the fluctuations could 
                              produce just the right enhanced attraction between 
                              them. His explanation was that the two plates 
                              limit the wavelength of vacuum fluctuations in the 
                              space between. Outside those confines, the 
                              fluctuations can have any wavelength they choose. 
                              With more waves outside than in, a pressure pushes 
                              inward on the plates (see 
                              diagram).   The effect is 
                              tiny: two plates 10 nanometres apart feel a force 
                              comparable to the gentle burden of the atmosphere 
                              on our heads. Such a minuscule contribution is 
                              easily washed out by a legion of other effects, 
                              such as residual electrostatic attractions between 
                              charges on the plates' surfaces. That makes 
                              confirming its existence extremely tough. "You 
                              need to know that you're really measuring the 
                              Casimir force," says experimentalist Hong 
                              Tang of YaleUniversity. What's more, 
                              it is not easy to align plates to be perfectly 
                              parallel, while calculating the expected effect 
                              for other, more complex geometries takes some 
                              sophisticated mathematics.  It was only in 1996 
                              that Steven Lamoreaux, a physicist then at 
                              the University of Washingtonin Seattle, 
                              made a breakthrough. Taking elaborate precautions 
                              to exclude all other effects, he found a tiny 
                              residual force pulling a metal plate and a 
                              spherical lens together (Physical Review 
                              Letters, vol 78, p 5). The Casimir effect, it 
                              seemed, was not a theorist's pipe dream: vacuum 
                              action was a real effect.   Since then, a 
                              steady trickle of results has confirmed other 
                              long-standing theoretical predictions. Soviet 
                              physicist Evgeny Lifshitz proposed in 1955 that 
                              the size of vacuum fluctuations would grow with 
                              rising temperature, resulting in a force that is 
                              more potent over longer distances. In February 
                              2011, Lamoreaux, now at Yale University, 
                              and his team confirmed that this is indeed the 
                              case (Nature Physics, 
                              vol 7, p 230)   Nanoscale kick  As for the work 
                              of Wilson's team, their results, published 
                              last November, support a four-decade-old 
                              prediction that turns the logic of the original 
                              Casimir effect on its head. Rather than using the 
                              vacuum's pop-up particles to shift their 
                              surroundings, if you move a vacuum's surroundings 
                              fast enough, you can make real photons of light. 
                              In some quarters, this idea is controversial - but 
                              it is the most dramatic putative demonstration of 
                              the vacuum's powers to date (see "Light from speeding 
                              mirrors")  As sightings of 
                              such effects have multiplied, so have thoughts 
                              that we might harness them for our own devices. A 
                              popular proposal is to use the vacuum's energy to 
                              give nanoscale machines an additional kick. That 
                              requires something a little different from the 
                              original Casimir force, whose attractive effects 
                              are more likely to gum up the components of any 
                              mini-machine - a phenomenon referred to 
                              as static friction or "stiction"  By tweaking the 
                              geometries or material properties of the 
                              structures used to confine the vacuum, however, it 
                              should be possible to reverse the direction of the 
                              Casimir effect, creating an outward pressure to 
                              push two objects apart. In 2008, Steven Johnson and his colleagues 
                              at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology 
                              calculated that by adding a series of interleaving 
                              metal brackets, zipper-style, to the faces of the 
                              two metal plates you could in theory make the net 
                              force between them repulsive. A more recent study 
                              by Stanislav Maslovski and Mário Silveirinha of 
                              the University of Coimbra, Portugal, has indicated 
                              a similar effect using nanoscale metallic rods to 
                              create areas of repulsive force that can levitate 
                              a nanoscale metal bar (Physical Review A, 
                              vol 83, p 022508).  These forces 
                              could help nanoscale components such as switches, 
                              gears, bearings or motor parts to operate without 
                              jamming. Putting such devices into practice might 
                              not be easy, though. For a start, it would require 
                              components with atomic-scale polishing: look on a 
                              small enough scale - a thousand atoms or so - and 
                              metal surfaces usually thought of as smooth have 
                              patchy, crystal-like structures that would confine 
                              vacuum fluctuations in different ways, affecting 
                              the size of the Casimir force. For moving objects, 
                              things become even trickier.   Such 
                              complications are surmountable: in 2009 Federico Capasso and 
                              group at Harvard 
                              University measured what appeared to be 
                              repulsive Casimir forces in a gold cantilever 
                              suspended in bromobenzene liquid above a silicon 
                              surface (Nature, vol 457, p 
                              170). The forces generated were mere tens of 
                              piconewtons - but when you are trying to move 
                              nanoscale particles, a piconewton goes a long way. 
                              Nevertheless, there are still hurdles to be 
                              overcome before Casimir devices are everyday 
                              reality, says Johnson. "It is an experimental 
                              question - can we make devices this small and 
                              sensitive?" he says. "And it is also a theoretical 
                              question of whether we can design interesting uses 
                              for the Casimir force once the experimental 
                              capabilities arrive. There is a more 
                              fundamental objection, however. The litany of 
                              theoretical predictions gradually being turned 
                              into experimental reality invites a simple 
                              conclusion: vacuum fluctuations are real, and they 
                              are what is responsible for what we call Casimir 
                              effects. But not all physicists buy 
                              that.   Their unease lies 
                              in calculations done by Casimir and Polder even 
                              before they settled on vacuum fluctuations as the 
                              explanation for the weakened van der Waals force. 
                              These showed that much the same weakening could be 
                              achieved simply by taking into account the finite 
                              time the force takes to be transmitted over large 
                              enough distances, such as between two plates 
                              separated by tens or hundreds of nanometres. That 
                              idea was revived and bolstered by calculations in 
                              the 1970s by the Nobel-prizewinning physicist 
                              Julian Schwinger. He never believed in the reality 
                              of vacuum fluctuations and developed a version of 
                              quantum field theory, which he called source 
                              theory, to do away with them. In this picture, the 
                              Casimir effect pops out just by taking into 
                              account the quantum interaction of charged matter, 
                              with no vacuum action at all   Robert Jaffe, a 
                              particle theorist at the Massachusetts Institute 
                              of Technology, suggests the only reason the vacuum 
                              interpretation has gained such currency is because 
                              its mathematics happens to be a lot simpler. "There 
                              is a flippant way people refer to the Casimir 
                              effect as evidence for real vacuum fluctuations," 
                              he says. "But there is no evidence that the vacuum 
                              fluctuations exist in the absence of matter". 
                              Similarly, other effects invoked as proof of their 
                              reality - the Lamb shift and the spontaneous 
                              emission of photons from atoms - can be described 
                              purely as the result of charge 
                              interactions   If this is so, it 
                              could have repercussions for more than our 
                              attempts to fine-tune the workings of 
                              nanomachines. The realisation in the past couple 
                              of decades that the universe's expansion is 
                              accelerating - a phenomenon ascribed to a 
                              mysterious "dark energy" - has 
                              fuelled a new interest in the power of the vacuum. 
                              At the moment, our best calculations of the 
                              vacuum's hidden energy come up with a figure some 
                              120 orders of magnitude larger than the amount 
                              needed to bring about the cosmic acceleration, a 
                              mismatch that counts perhaps as the worst-ever 
                              prediction in physics. Yet observations of the 
                              Casimir effect are still eagerly seen as evidence 
                              for a power that might determine our cosmic 
                              fate.  Schwinger's 
                              original calculations were part of a wider 
                              attempt, ultimately unsuccessful, to banish vacuum 
                              fluctuations from quantum field theory. The truth 
                              may well lie uncomfortably in the middle: we might 
                              never be able to convince ourselves of the reality 
                              of vacuum energy, because any attempt to do so 
                              brings some form of matter into the equation. 
                              As philosophers of science 
                              Svend Rugh and Henrik Zinkernagel wrote in 
                              2001, "It seems impossible to decide whether 
                              the effects result from the vacuum 'in itself'... 
                              or are generated by the introduction of the 
                              measurement arrangement."  Wilson hopes that 
                              the photons emerging from his apparatus 
                              in Sweden, if confirmed by other groups, will 
                              provide the final illumination to prove the 
                              reality of vacuum fluctuations. Equally, as our 
                              ability to construct filigree nanomachines and so 
                              test the Casimir effect increases over the coming 
                              years, perhaps some deviation from the predictions 
                              will give us a definitive handle on where the 
                              effects come from. Can nothing truly come of 
                              nothing? We might still have cause to speak 
                              again.  Light from speeding 
                              MIRRORS  In 1970, American 
                              physicist Gerald Moore proposed reversing the 
                              logic of the Casimir effect. He envisaged rapidly 
                              accelerating mirrors that would squeeze the vacuum 
                              fluctuations in the space between them so 
                              violently that they would give up some of their 
                              energy in the form of photons (Journal of 
                              Mathematical Physics, vol 11, p 2679). In practice it is 
                              not possible to accelerate even a small 
                              macroscopic mirror fast enough to produce this 
                              "dynamical" Casimir effect, so last year Chris 
                              Wilson and his team from the Chalmers University 
                              of Technology in Gothenburg, Sweden, used rapidly 
                              varying electrical currents to simulate the effect 
                              of mirrors accelerating to something like a 
                              quarter of the speed of light. The result was the 
                              simultaneous production of pairs of photons from 
                              the vacuum, exactly as Moore had 
                              predicted (Nature, vol 479, p 
                              376)  Wilson thinks 
                              there could be some exciting applications. During 
                              the era of inflation thought to have taken place 
                              right after the big bang, the boundary of the 
                              universe itself would have expanded at near the 
                              speed of light, leading to the creation of photons 
                              through the dynamical Casimir effect. "It is 
                              rather difficult to create your own big bang in 
                              the lab," says Wilson. "Our set-up or a 
                              similar one might be used to simulate these 
                              effects, essentially doing table-top 
                              cosmology.  Just as the 
                              original Casimir effect is disputed, however (see 
                              main story), not everyone is convinced that this 
                              interpretation of the experiment is right. One 
                              physicist, who preferred not to be named, says 
                              that as nothing in the experiment actually moves, 
                              it does not demonstrate the dynamical Casimir 
                              effect at all. Instead, it is just another "solid 
                              and interesting" example of a well-known effect in 
                              which some of a quantum circuit's electrical 
                              energy is emitted as light. The mathematical 
                              description of the two effects is very similar, he 
                              says, but "one should never mistake mathematics 
                              for reality".  Since the 
                              preliminary version of their paper was 
                              circulated, Wilson's team has carried out 
                              additional tests that Wilson thinks 
                              defuse such criticisms, although he acknowledges 
                              there are still dissenting voices. "We did a number 
                              of sanity checks ruling out various spurious 
                              effects that could have masqueraded as the effect, 
                              including showing that we were starting from the 
                              vacuum state," he says. "But for some people, the 
                              dynamical Casimir effect will never be anything 
                              but a literal moving mirror."  David 
                              Harris is a 
                              writer based in Palo Alto, 
                              California       |  
                          
                          
                            | 5) ARPA-E Issues Open 
                              Call for Transformational 
                              Technologies  |  
                            | 
                              
                              US 
                              DOE Energy.gov Press Release, March 2, 2012 - 
                              2:31pm http://energy.gov/articles/arpa-e-issues-open-call-transformational-energy-technologies    DOE's 
                              Advanced Research Projects Agency-Energy 
                              (ARPA-E) issued a $150 million funding 
                              opportunity on March 2 that is open to all 
                              transformational energy technologies. This Open 
                              Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) is a call 
                              to scientists, engineers, and entrepreneurs to 
                              propose early-stage research projects that would 
                              not otherwise be able to attract private 
                              investment. Such projects could lead to 
                              breakthrough energy technologies. This is the 
                              second Open FOA released under ARPA-E. The 
                              open call includes electricity generation by 
                              renewable means; electricity transmission, 
                              storage, and distribution; energy efficiency for 
                              buildings, manufacturing and commerce, and 
                              personal use; and all aspects of transportation, 
                              including the production and distribution of 
                              renewable fuels, electrification, and energy 
                              efficiency in transportation. Individual awards 
                              under the Open FOA will range between $250,000 and 
                              $10 million. See the DOE press 
                              release (below) and the FOA 
                              announcement online.    Washington, 
                              D.C. - Today, the Advanced Research 
                              Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) issued a $150 million funding 
                              opportunity open to all transformational energy 
                              technologies to support the Obama Administration's 
                              all-of-the-above approach to solving our nation's 
                              most pressing energy challenges. This Open Funding 
                              Opportunity Announcement is a call to our 
                              country's brightest scientists, engineers and 
                              entrepreneurs to propose early-stage research 
                              projects that would not otherwise be able to 
                              attract private investment, but could lead to 
                              breakthrough energy technologies. This is the 
                              second open funding opportunity released under 
                              ARPA-E.  The first was in 
                              2009. "Today 
                              we are calling on our nation's best and brightest 
                              to catalyze energy breakthroughs in all areas 
                              imaginable through this Open Funding Opportunity 
                              Announcement, which illustrates the true purpose 
                              of ARPA-E," said Director 
                               Majumdar.  
                              "Innovation is our nation's sweet spot, and it is 
                              critically important that we look at every 
                              possible energy solution in order to ensure 
                              America's future prosperity and 
                              security." This 
                              Open Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) joins 
                              ARPA-E's other recently issued FOA - 
                              Methane Opportunities for Vehicular Energy (MOVE) 
                              - which will make $30 million available to find 
                              ways to harness our abundant supplies of domestic 
                              natural gas for vehicles and was announced by 
                              President Obama last week at the University of 
                              Miami. More 
                              details on all of ARPA-E's Funding Opportunities and 
                              Requests For Information are available HERE. 
                              Individual awards under the Open FOA will range 
                              between $250,000 and $10 million. President 
                              Obama launched the Energy Department's Advanced 
                              Research Projects Agency - Energy (ARPA-E) in 2009 to seek out 
                              transformational, breakthrough technologies that 
                              are too risky for private sector investment but 
                              have the potential to translate science into 
                              quantum leaps in energy technology, form the 
                              foundation for entirely new industries, and in the 
                              future have large commercial impact. Including 
                              its most recent round of selections, ARPA-E has funded a total of more 
                              than 180 projects, for $521.7 million in awards 
                              across 12 program areas. Demonstrating the success 
                              ARPA-E has already seen, the 
                              Agency announced last year that eleven of its 
                              projects that received $40 million from ARPA-E for innovative research, 
                              were able to use this funding to demonstrate 
                              results, which allowed these teams to secure more 
                              than $200 million in outside private capital 
                              investment. ARPA-E's third annual Energy Innovation 
                              Summit featured 107 speakers, including: President 
                              Bill Clinton; Microsoft Founder and Chairman, Bill 
                              Gates; Xerox CEO, Ursula Burns; FedEx CEO, Fred 
                              Smith; BDT Capital Chairman, Lee Scott; Deputy 
                              Secretary of Defense, Ashton Carter; MIT 
                              President, Susan Hockfield; U.S. Energy Secretary, 
                              Steven Chu; and ARPA-E Director, Arun 
                              Majumdar.  The Summit attracted 2,440 
                              attendees from 49 states and 26 countries and 
                              featured a Technology Showcase displaying over 240 
                              breakthrough energy developments from ARPA-E's awardees, finalists and other 
                              teams.News Media Contact: 
                               202-586-4940   |  
                          
                          
                            | 
                              
                              About Integrity 
                              Research Institute 
                               Future 
                              Energy eNews is 
                              provided as a public service from Integrity Research 
                              Institute, a 
                              Non-Profit dedicated to educating the public 
                              on eco-friendly emerging energy technologies. FREE copy 
                              of the 30 minute DVD "Progress in Future Energy" 
                              is available by sending an email with "Free DVD" in subject 
                              and mailing address in 
                              body.   Your 
                              generous support is welcome by making a tax 
                              deductible donation on our 
                              secure website |  |  |  |  
          | 
              
              
                | 
                    
                    
                      | 
                          Scott Kelsey, 
                          Missouri State, explaining Rejuvamatrix, 
                          Pulsed EMF therapy to increase the length of DNA 
                          telomeres, which directly affect our lifespan.
                          Max 
                          Formitchev-Zamilov, Penn State, 
                           discussing Cavitation Induced Fusion, that will 
                          soon provide power generation and heat production.
                          Christopher 
                          Provaditis, from Greece, explaining 
                          Inertial Propulsion and who teamed up recently with 
                          Boeing for their space satellites.
                          PJ Piper 
                          of QM Power, discussing the 
                          motor invented by Charles Flynn, with a revolutionary 
                          parallel path that gives double and triple 
efficiency. 
                          Dr Thorsten 
                          Ludwig  from Germany (GASE) 
                          discussing the mysterious Hans Coler motor that WWII 
                          British Intelligence researched. |   |  
                      |  |  |  |  |