|
Dear
Subscriber,
We are pleased to present an excerpt this month of
one of many great COFE4 papers that you can
experience in person at the conference. We are
featuring Moray King, who has put together a
fascinating theory that the dominant energy coming
from the water electrolyzers is
not from hydrogen, but rather it is from another
source which might be far more energetic: charged
water gas clusters, which activate and coherently
harvest zero-point energy (ZPE). His experimental
evidence is also quite compelling (story
#1). IRI is also extending a 25% discount
until Feb. 15, 2011 for early registration, with
five conferences in one this
year!
Our
story #2 brings the traditional year review of
energy developments from MIT. Of course, we are
seeing the electric car dominating the news with
better batteries. I have even seen a development
that predicts electric cars will
become fully practical by 2020. This is because
companies in Denmark are making wind-powered
charging stations for electric cars. Freshly
charged batteries are exchanged for drained
batteries in less time than it takes to fill a car
with gas. Consumers pay for the service on monthly
plans like mobile phone service. Analysts at
Deutsche Bank are enthusiastic and believe this
concept could eventually transform the auto
industry and neutralize petrodollar power within
the next decade.
To
bring our story #3 on antimatter into the realm of
future energy, it is noted that physicist Gerald
Smith did research at Penn State to produce an
antimatter propulsion engine.
While it seems difficult and expensive to produce
antimatter on earth, nature has now been seen
producing it easily from high voltage
thunderstorms. This is because extremely high
voltage will cause "The Decay of the
Vacuum" (Sci. Amer., Dec. 1979, p. 153) which
releases negative energy particles. Hopefully,
this story will inspire the next generation to
raise the voltage in the lab for useful quantities
of antiparticles.
We
are cautious about releasing story #4 that claims
a cold fusion demonstration with nickel and
hydrogen and it is up to the reader to decide if
it is sufficiently convincing. There also is a
patent application with more details of the
process http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20110005506
. COFE4 will also feature a couple of papers from
experts in the field who will be able to answer
questions about this new process.
Our
last story brings the bioreactor and biofuel
developments into the realm of converting "carbon
dioxide into fuel" which certainly has an
advantage for mitigating climate change if it
every becomes a mainstream industry.
Thomas Valone,
PhD,
PE Editor www.IntegrityResearchInstitute.org | |
and
save 25% |
|
| |
1) Water
Electrolyzers and the Zero-Point
Energy |
Moray
B. King, P.O. Box 859 Provo, UT
84601
mbking42@aol.com Abstract.
The gas emitted from popular water electrolyzer
projects manifests unusual energetic anomalies,
which include vaporizing tungsten when used in a
welding torch and running internal combustion
engines on small quantities of the gas. Some claim
to run generators in closed loop fashion solely on
the gas from the electrolyzer, which is powered
solely from the generator. Most investigators
believe the energy is from burning hydrogen. A
hypothesis is proposed that the dominant energy is
not coming from hydrogen, but rather it is coming
from charged water gas clusters, which activate
and coherently trap zero-point energy.
INTRODUCTION The
water electrolyzer projects are popular with
inventors and hobbyists worldwide. There are
thousands of videos posted on YouTube under the
search, water fuel. Nearly everyone believes their
electrolyzers produce a mixture of hydrogen and
oxygen gas known by various names such as HHO,
hydroxy, oxyhydrogen, and Brown's gas. Yull Brown
(1977) is famous for investigating the welding
applications of the gas and discovered intriguing
energetic anomalies (Wiseman, 1998). The gas
exhibits a cool flame, ~130 degrees C, yet it can
vaporize tungsten, a feat beyond today's
commercial welding torches (Wiseman, 2001). The
academic community has yet to explore or explain
this anomaly. Burning hydrogen cannot account for
it. Perhaps the most popular
application of the water electrolyzers is to boost
an automobile's gasoline mileage (Kelly, 2008;
Panacea, 2010). An energy anomaly manifests here
as well for the boosters typically produce only a
few (5-20) liters of uncompressed gas per minute.
Yet many claim significant increase in miles per
gallon (20 - 50%). Burning hydrogen cannot account
for it. Even more surprisingly some
investigators have claimed to run gasoline
generators on 5 to 6 liters per minute of the
uncompressed gas, and the generator's electrical
output was stable on the order of a kilowatt
(Allan, 2009, 2010). Such claims appear
remarkable, considering the low efficiency of
typical internal combustion engines (~20%).
Burning hydrogen certainly cannot account for
this.
This
paper will explore the hypothesis that the
dominant energy coming from the water
electrolyzers is not from hydrogen, but rather it
is from another source which might be far more
energetic: charged water gas clusters, which
activate and coherently harvest zero-point energy
(ZPE). Others have proposed a coherent water
zero-point energy interaction. Prevenslik (2001)
introduced a model where a collapsing nano bubble
coherently activates a standing wave from the ZPE
whose continuously increasing resonant frequency
acts like an ultraviolet to x-ray laser which
coincides with the dissociation frequency of the
water's hydrogen-oxygen bond to yield charge
separation. He applied the model to explain steam
electricity, waterfall ionization,
sonoluminescence, and thundercloud charge
separation. If Prevenslik is correct, it implies
the zero-point energy significantly contributes to
lightning formation. Appendix A summarizes the
author's hypothesis (King, 1989, 2001) on how the
zero-point energy might coherently participate in
self-organized collectives involving ionized
matter or plasma. To further support
the ZPE hypothesis, another phenomenon that
exhibits energetic anomalies similar to Brown's
gas is discussed in Appendix B: plasma charge
clusters. Plasma charge clusters are a form of
microscopic ball lightning that have been
experimentally observed and extensively studied by
Ken Shoulders (1991). He named them "electrum
validum" (EV) meaning "strong charge," and later
renamed them "exotic vacuum objects" (EVO) when he
became convinced that they coherently coupled to
the ZPE to account for the excessive energy they
manifested (Hasslberger, 2007). The observed
energetic anomalies in their interaction with high
melting point ceramics are similar to those
exhibited by the Brown's gas welding
torch.
back to table of
contents |
2) The Year
in Energy |
Kevin
Bulls, MIT Technology
Review December 30, 2011
http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/26984/page1/
Electric
cars arrive, and solar, batteries, biofuels, and
engines all advance
At
the end of 2010, GM and Nissan introduced their
long-awaited electric cars, the plug-in hybrid
Chevrolet Volt and the all-electric Nissan Leaf.
If these are successful, they could bring sweeping
changes to the automobile industry, which has
relied almost exclusively on petroleum to power
its cars. But whether electric vehicles become
popular depends on improving the technology,
especially by developing better batteries.
|
Nissan Leaf,
Picture Coutesy of
Nissan |
Better
Batteries
The
Volt and the Leaf use advanced lithium-ion
batteries that the automakers calculate will last
many times longer than the batteries in your
laptop. But they're expensive, and the distance
they can power a car is limited. In the near term,
better electrodes that store more energy using
less material could help, such as the silicon ones
Panasonic is rolling out (Tesla to Use High-Energy
Batteries from Panasonic). And a new test
could allow researchers to quickly sort through
combinations of electrodes and electrolytes to
find ones that will last for the life of a car (A Quicker Test for EV
Batteries).
Over
the long term, novel battery chemistries such as
lithium-sulfur offer potentially much greater
energy storage at a lower cost than lithium-ion
batteries (Packing More into Lithium
Batteries). And a new approach that uses fluid
electrodes rather than solid ones could help break
through the energy storage limits that make it
hard for electric cars to compete with gas-powered
ones (New Battery for Cheap
Electric Vehicles).
Cheaper
Solar Power
In
many parts of the country, electric cars will
essentially be coal-powered, running on
electricity generated by the fossil fuel. Electric
power is highly efficient, so they will emit less
carbon dioxide than conventional cars. But if
electric cars are to achieve their true potential
for reducing pollution, they will need to use more
renewable energy or low-carbon sources of
electricity such as nuclear power (Giant Holes in the
Ground).
Solar
power saw significant advances this year, as
conventional-solar-panel makers cuts costs and
improved efficiency and laboratories rolled out
advanced prototypes. China was a big part of the
story, as its manufacturers refined their designs
(Solar's Great Leap
Forward).
In
the United States, government loan guarantees
helped increase investment in solar technology,
including by thin-film-solar makers such as Abound
Solar (Solar Cell Maker Gets a
$400-Million Boost). It is not clear, however,
what will happen to federally supported industries
when the money from the 2009 stimulus bill runs
out (Cash for
Infrastructure). Funding from the new Advanced
Research Projects Agency for Energy (ARPA-E) is
being used to find cheaper ways to manufacture
conventional silicon solar panels (Making More Solar Cells
from Silicon).
Meanwhile,
laboratories made prototypes of potentially
ultra-efficient new kinds of solar panels.
Nanostructures help solar panels absorb light,
increasing their power output by 30 percent or
more (TR10: Light-Trapping
Photovoltaics and Solar Cells Use
Nanoparticles to Capture More Sunlight).
Researchers are finding ways around the inherent
physical limitations of semiconductors,
demonstrating in a prototype solar cell an effect
that allows photons to generate multiple
electrons. This approach could increase solar
power output by 50 percent (Upping the Limit on Solar
Cell Efficiency). A novel approach that uses
both heat and light from the sun to make
electricity could potentially double the output of
solar panels (A New Way to Use the
Sun's Energy).
These
prototypes are many years from commercialization,
but by increasing the power output of solar panels
without greatly increasing the cost to make them,
they could reduce not only the cost per watt for
solar panels but also the number of solar panels
needed and therefore shipping and installation
costs-something that will be key for solar to go
head to head with conventional power.
Clean
Fuels and Efficient Engines
Meanwhile,
better engines will reduce the need for petroleum.
A number of new engine prototypes can achieve fuel
efficiencies that exceed that of hybrid vehicles
(Reinventing the Gasoline
Engine, 70 mpg, without a
Hybrid, and The Two-Stroke Engine,
Reconsidered).
Even
as advanced biofuels such as cellulosic ethanol
are slowly coming to market (What's Holding Biofuels
Back?), companies are developing a new
generation of biofuels with chemical properties
like those of gasoline or diesel-replacements that
can be used in existing cars and transported in
existing pipelines. Researchers created genes that
allow bacteria to produce diesel fuel, and these
are being commercialized by a company called LS9
(Genes to Make Hydrocarbon
Fuels). Another company has started producing
a precursor to synthetic diesel in Brazil (Searching for Biofuels'
Sweet Spot). Researchers have also engineered
microorganisms that can convert sunlight and water
into diesel (TR10: Solar Fuel).
And the U.S. government has funded a $122 million
research center with the goal of converting
sunlight to fuel without using organisms (Fuel from the Sun).
To
be sure, it will be years before many of these
advances work their way into the marketplace. The
lack of a comprehensive energy policy in the
United States, where many of the innovations are
taking place, doesn't help (Piecemeal Energy Policy
Will Still Cut Greenhouse Emissions). And the
inability of Congress to pass a budget this year
could stifle research and development-the funding
of ARPA-E, for example, hangs in the balance (Dim Prospects for Energy
R&D). But if the willingness to compromise
that allowed Democrats and Republicans to pass a
tax-cut bill at the end of the year continues,
there may be surprising progress. Meanwhile, China
continues to push forward with plans to lead the
world in electric vehicles, providing government
incentives to develop the cars and install
charging stations. Next year, that ambition will
be evident outside China, as Chinese automaker BYD
plans to start
selling its first electric car in the United
States
back to table of
contents |
3)
Thunderstorms Produce
Antimatter |
Tony
Phillips, NASA Science News, Jan. 11,
2011:
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2010/11jan_antimatter/
Ed Note:
See "Harnessing the Power of
Antiparticles", Science Illustrated,
January-February, 2011, p. 36 for rocket
propulsion applications of antimatter "fast enough
to get to Mars in a
month".
Scientists using NASA's
Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope have detected
beams of antimatter produced above thunderstorms
on Earth, a phenomenon never seen before.
Scientists think the antimatter particles were
formed inside thunderstorms in a terrestrial
gamma-ray flash (TGF) associated with lightning.
It is estimated that about 500 TGFs occur daily
worldwide, but most go undetected.
"These
signals are the first direct evidence that
thunderstorms make antimatter particle beams,"
said Michael Briggs, a member of Fermi's Gamma-ray
Burst Monitor (GBM) team at the University of
Alabama in Huntsville (UAH). He presented the
findings Monday, during a news briefing at the
American Astronomical Society meeting in
Seattle.
An
artist's concept of antimatter spraying above a
thunderhead.
Fermi is designed to
monitor gamma rays, the highest energy form of
light. When antimatter striking Fermi collides
with a particle of normal matter, both particles
immediately are annihilated and transformed into
gamma rays. The GBM has detected gamma rays with
energies of 511,000 electron volts, a signal
indicating an electron has met its antimatter
counterpart, a positron. Although Fermi's GBM
is designed to observe high-energy events in the
universe, it's also providing valuable insights
into this strange phenomenon. The GBM constantly
monitors the entire celestial sky above and the
Earth below. The GBM team has identified 130 TGFs
since Fermi's launch in 2008. "In orbit for
less than three years, the Fermi mission has
proven to be an amazing tool to probe the
universe. Now we learn that it can discover
mysteries much, much closer to home," said Ilana
Harrus, Fermi program scientist at NASA
Headquarters in Washington.
Fermi was above Egypt
on Dec. 14, 2009, when a burst of positrons
emerged from an African thunderstorm. The
spacecraft was located immediately above a
thunderstorm for most of the observed TGFs, but in
four cases, storms were far from Fermi. In
addition, lightning-generated radio signals
detected by a global monitoring network indicated
the only lightning at the time was hundreds or
more miles away. During one TGF, which occurred on
Dec. 14, 2009, Fermi was located over Egypt. But
the active storm was in Zambia, some 2,800 miles
to the south. The distant storm was below Fermi's
horizon, so any gamma rays it produced could not
have been detected.
"Even
though Fermi couldn't see the storm, the
spacecraft nevertheless was magnetically connected
to it," said Joseph Dwyer at the Florida Institute
of Technology in Melbourne, Fla. "The TGF produced
high-speed electrons and positrons, which then
rode up Earth's magnetic field to strike the
spacecraft." The beam continued past Fermi,
reached a location, known as a mirror point, where
its motion was reversed, and then hit the
spacecraft a second time just 23 milliseconds
later. Each time, positrons in the beam collided
with electrons in the spacecraft. The particles
annihilated each other, emitting gamma rays
detected by Fermi's GBM.
Scientists
long have suspected TGFs arise from the strong
electric fields near the tops of thunderstorms.
Under the right conditions, they say, the field
becomes strong enough that it drives an upward
avalanche of electrons. Reaching speeds nearly as
fast as light, the high-energy electrons give off
gamma rays when they're deflected by air
molecules. Normally, these gamma rays are detected
as a TGF.
But
the cascading electrons produce so many gamma rays
that they blast electrons and positrons clear out
of the atmosphere. This happens when the gamma-ray
energy transforms into a pair of particles: an
electron and a positron. It's these particles that
reach Fermi's orbit.
The
detection of positrons shows many high-energy
particles are being ejected from the atmosphere.
In fact, scientists now think that all TGFs emit
electron/positron beams. A paper on the findings
has been accepted for publication in Geophysical
Research Letters.
"The
Fermi results put us a step closer to
understanding how TGFs work," said Steven Cummer
at Duke University. "We still have to figure out
what is special about these storms and the precise
role lightning plays in the
process."
back to table of
contents
|
4)
Italian Scientists claim to demonstrate Cold
Fusion |
January 20, 2011
by Lisa Zyga - (PhysOrg.com)
-- Few areas of science are more
controversial than cold fusion, the hypothetical
near-room-temperature reaction in which two
smaller nuclei join together to form a single
larger nucleus while releasing large amounts of
energy. In the 1980s, Stanley Pons and Martin
Fleishmann claimed to have demonstrated cold
fusion - which could potentially provide the world
with a cheap, clean energy source - but their
experiment could not be reproduced. Since then,
all other claims of cold fusion have been
illegitimate, and studies have shown that cold
fusion is theoretically implausible, causing
mainstream science to become highly speculative of
the field in general.
The latest news occurred
last week, when Italian scientists Andrea Rossi
and Sergio Focardi of the University of Bologna
announced that they developed a cold fusion <http://www.physorg.com/tags/cold+fusion/>
device capable of producing 12,400 W of heat power
with an input of just 400 W. Last Friday, the
scientists held a private invitation press
conference in Bologna, attended by about 50
people, where they demonstrated what they claim is
a nickel <http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-italian-scientists-cold-fusion-video.html#>
-hydrogen fusion reactor <http://www.physorg.com/tags/fusion+reactor/>
. Further, the scientists say that the reactor is
well beyond the research phase; they plan to start
shipping commercial devices within the next three
months and start mass production by the end of
2011.
See full article at
Pysorg.com <http://Pysorg.com>
<http://Pysorg.com
<http://Pysorg.com/> >
: http://www.physorg.com/news/2011-01-italian-scientists-cold-fusion-video.html
Ed. note: Why it works
however, is not something even the inventors can
explain. It has however a patent application: http://www.faqs.org/patents/app/20110005506 for
the details of the experimental equipment and the
process used. - TV
RELATED
ARTICLES
Next
Big Future, January 13, 2011,
http://nextbigfuture.com/2011/01/multi-kilowatt-nickel-hydrogen-cold.html
There
will be 10 kilowatt nickel hydrogen cold fusion
demonstrations on January 14 and 15th in Italy and
peer reviewed papers
Hydrogen/Nickel
cold fusion probable mechanism
The
Focardi-Rossi approach considers this shielding a
basic requirement for surpassing the Coulomb
barrier between the hydrogen nuclei (protons) and
the Nickel lattice nuclei, resulting into release
of energy, which is a fact, through a series of
exothermic nuclear processes leading to
transmutations, decays, etc.
The
reasoning presented in this note is based on
elementary considerations of
·
The hydrogen atom (Bohr) in its fundamental energy
state · The Heisenberg uncertainty
principle · The high speed of nuclear reactions
(10ˆ-20 sec)
The
hydrogen atom (Bohr) in its fundamental state, in
the absence of energy perturbations, remains
indefinitely in its stationary state shown below.
This is due to the in-phase wave (de Broglie),
which follows the "circular" path of its single
orbiting electron. The wave length and radius of
the "circular" path are determined by the
fundamental energy state of this atom.
When
hydrogen atoms come in contact with the metal
(Ni), they abandon their stationary state as they
deposit their electrons in the conductivity band
of the metal, and due to their greatly reduced
volume, compared to that of their atom, the
hydrogen nuclei (naked protons) readily diffuse
into the defects of the nickel crystalline
structure as well as in tetrahedral or octahedral
void spaces of the crystal lattice.
It
should be underlined that, in addition to the
deposited hydrogen electrons, in the nickel mass
included are also electrons of the chemical
potential of the metal. Jointly these electrons
constitute the conductivity electronic cloud,
distributed in energy bands (Fermi), and quasi
free to move throughout the metallic mass.
it
is conceivable that, for a very short time period
(e.g. 10ˆ-18 sec), a series of neutral mini atoms
of hydrogen could be formed, in an unstable state,
of various size and energy level, distributed
within the Fermi band, which is enlarged due to
the very short time (Heisenberg).
The
neutral mini-atoms of high energy and very short
wave length - which is in phase with the "cyclic"
orbit (de Broglie) - are statistically captured be
the nickel nuclei of the crystal structure with
the speed of nuclear reactions (10ˆ-20 sec).
For
these mini-atoms to fuse with the nickel nuclei,
apart from their neutral character for surpassing
the Coulomb barrier, they must have dimensions
smaller than 10ˆ-14 m, where nuclear cohesion
forces, of high intensity but very short range,
are predominant. It is assumed that only a
percentage of such atoms satisfy this condition
(de Broglie).
The
above considerations are based only on an
intuitive approach and I trust this phenomenon
could be tackled in a systematic and integrated
way through the "theory of time dependent
perturbations" by employing the appropriate
Hamiltonian
The
mechanism proposed by Focardi - Rossi, verified by
mass spectroscopy data, which predicts
transmutation of a nickel nucleus to an unstable
copper nucleus (isotope), remains in principle
valid. The difference is that inside the unstable
copper nucleus, produced from the fusion of a
hydrogen mini-atom with a nickel nucleus, is
trapped the mini-atom electron (β-), which in my
opinion undergoes in-situ annihilation, with the
predicted (Focardi-Rossi) decay β+ of the new
copper nucleus.
The
β+ and β- annihilation (interaction of matter and
anti-matter) would lead to the emission of a high
energy photon, γ, (Einstein) from the nucleus of
the now stable copper isotope and a neutrin to
conserve the lepton number. However, based on the
principle of conservation of momentum, as a result
of the backlash of this nucleus, the photon energy
γ is divided into kinetic energy of this nucleus
of large mass (heat) and a photon of low
frequency.
Furthermore,
it should be noted that the system does not
exhibit the Mössbauer* phenomenon for two
reasons:
1.
The copper nucleus is not part of the nickel
crystal structure and behaves as an isolated atom
in quasi gaseous state 2. Copper, as a chemical
element, does not exhibit the Mössbauer
phenomenon.
In
conclusion, it should be underlined that the
copper nucleus thermal perturbation, as a result
of its mechanical backlash(heat), is transferred
to its encompassing nickel lattice and propagated,
by in phase phonons (G. Preparata), through the
entire nano-crystal. This could explain why in
cold fusion the released energy is mainly in the
form of heat and the produced (low) γ radiation
can be easily shielded.
Further
Reading
Is
the Rossi energy amplifier the first pico-chemical
reactor?
The
nuclear signatures that can be expected when
contacting hydrogen with nickel, were derived from
thermal results recently obtained (Rossi energy
amplifier), using the type of reaction paths
proposed as the explanation of the energy
produced. The consequences of proton or neutron
capture have been studied. It was shown that these
consequences are not in line with the experimental
observations. A novel tentative explanation is
thus described. Should this explanation be true,
it is proposed to call pico-chemistry the novel
field thus opened.
Nuclear
signatures to be expected from Rossi energy
amplifier
Strong
nuclear signatures are expected from the Rossi
energy amplifier and it is hoped that this note
can help evidence them.
It
is of interest to note that in a mechanism is
proposed, that strongly suppresses the gamma
emission during the run (it is the same mechanism
that creates very low energy neutrons,
subsequently captured by the nickel. This does not
suppress the emission after shut-down, which
should be observed, together with the
transmutations described above.
back to table of
contents
|
5) TR-10
Solar Fuel |
By Kevin
Bullis, Technology Review, May/June 2010
(reprinted for TR10, Jan. 2011) http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/25077/
This article is part of an
annual 2010 list of what we believe are the 10
most important emerging technologies.
Designing the perfect
renewable fuel.
When Noubar Afeyan, the CEO
of Flagship Ventures in Cambridge, MA, set out to
invent the ideal renewable fuel, he decided to
eliminate the middleman. Biofuels ultimately come
from carbon dioxide and water, so why persist in
making them from biomass--corn or switchgrass or
algae? "What we wanted to know," Afeyan says, "is
could we engineer a system that could convert
carbon dioxide directly into any fuel that we
wanted?"
The answer seems to be yes,
according to Joule Biotechnologies, the company
that Afeyan founded (also in Cambridge) to design
this new fuel. By manipulating and designing
genes, Joule has created photosynthetic
microörganisms that use sunlight to efficiently
convert carbon dioxide into ethanol or diesel--the
first time this has ever been done, the company
says. Joule grows the microbes in photobioreactors
that need no fresh water and occupy only a
fraction of the land needed for biomass-based
approaches. The creatures secrete fuel
continuously, so it's easy to collect. Lab tests
and small trials lead Afeyan to estimate that the
process will yield 100 times as much fuel per
hectare as fermenting corn to produce ethanol, and
10 times as much as making it from sources such as
agricultural waste. He says costs could be
competitive with those of fossil fuels.
|
Joule Biotechnologies'
genetilcally engineered microorganisms can turn
sunlight into ethanol or diesel. Credit: Bob
O'Connor |
If Afeyan is right, biofuels
could become an alternative to petroleum on a much
broader scale than has ever seemed possible. The
supply of conventional biofuels, such as those
made from corn, is constrained by the vast amount
of water and agricultural land needed to grow the
plants they're made from. And while advanced
biofuels require less water and don't need
high-quality land, their potential is limited by
the expensive, multistep processes needed to make
them. As a result, the International Energy Agency
estimates that in 2050, biodiesel and ethanol will
meet only 26 percent of world demand for
transportation fuel.
Joule's bioengineers have
equipped their microörganisms with a genetic
switch that limits growth. The scientists allow
them to multiply for only a couple of days before
flipping that switch to divert the organisms'
energy from growth into fuel production. While
other companies try to grow as much biomass as
possible, Afeyan says, "I want to make as little
biomass as I can." In retrospect, the approach
might seem obvious. Indeed, the startup Synthetic
Genomics and an academic group at the
BioTechnology Institute at the University of
Minnesota are also working on making fuels
directly from carbon dioxide. Joule hopes to
succeed by developing both its organisms and its
photobioreactor from scratch, so that they work
perfectly together.
Still, it's a risky
strategy, since it departs from established
processes. Usually, a startup sets out determined
to do something novel, says James Collins, a
professor of biomedical engineering at Boston
University and a member of Joule's scientific
advisory board, "and it falls quickly back on
trying to find something that works ... an old
thing that's been well established." Afeyan,
however, has pushed the company to stay
innovative. This summer, it will move beyond
lab-scale tinkering; an outdoor pilot plant is
currently under construction in Leander,
TX.
As both a venture
capitalist and a technologist--he received his PhD
in chemical engineering from MIT in 1987--Afeyan
is keenly aware of the challenges in demonstrating
that a novel process can operate economically and
make fuel in large volumes. To minimize the
financial risks, he steered Joule toward a modular
process that doesn't require large and expensive
demonstration plants. "I'm not saying it's easy
or around the corner, because I've done this for a
long time," Afeyan says. But he does believe that
Joule is onto something big: a renewable fuel that
could compete with fossil fuels on both cost and
scale. He says, "We have the elements of a
potentially transformative technology."
back to table of
contents |
About Integrity
Research Institute
Future
Energy eNews is
provided as a public service from Integrity Research
Institute, a
Non-Profit dedicated to educating the public
on eco-friendly emerging energy technologies.
FREE copy
of the 30 minute DVD "Progress in Future Energy"
is available by sending an email with "Free DVD" in subject
and mailing address in
body.
Your
generous support is welcome by making a tax
deductible donation on our
secure website | | | |
Save 10% |
On
all purchases from IRI by becoming a
member and
a free gift when you join and you save 10% on all
conference and workshop fees as well. You
will receive a quarterly mailing with the latest
information on eco-friendly emerging energy
technologies. All 2011 IRI members will receive free
copies of Energy magazines and the latest emerging
energy technologies reports. |
| | | |