Future Energy
eNews IntegrityResearchInstitute.org June
24, 2008
|
The new Verenium plant is the first demonstration-scale cellulosic ethanol plant in the United States. It will be used to try out variations on the company's technology and is designed to run continuously. Verenium wants to demonstrate that it can create ethanol for $2 a gallon, which it hopes will make the fuel competitive with other types of ethanol and gasoline. Next year, the company plans to begin construction on commercial plants that will each produce about 20 to 30 million gallons of ethanol a year.
Until now, technology for converting nonfood feedstocks into ethanol has been limited to the lab and to small-scale pilot plants that can produce thousands of gallons of ethanol a year. Since these don't operate continuously, they don't give an accurate idea of how much it will ultimately cost to produce cellulosic ethanol in a commercial-scale facility.
Almost all ethanol biofuel in the United States is currently made from corn kernels. But the need for cellulosic feedstocks of ethanol has been underscored recently as food prices worldwide have risen sharply, in part because of the use of corn as a source of biofuels. At the same time, the rising cost of corn and gas have begun to make cellulosic ethanol more commercially attractive, says Wallace Tyner, a professor of agricultural economics at Purdue University. A new Renewable Fuels Standard, part of an energy bill that became law late last year, mandates the use of 100 million gallons of cellulosic biofuels by 2010, and 16 billion by 2022.
So far, however, there are no commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plants in operation in the United States, although a number of facilities are scheduled to start production in the next few years. The Department of Energy is currently funding more than a dozen companies that will be building demonstration- and commercial-scale plants. One of these, Range Fuels, based in Broomfield, CO, plans to open a commercial-scale plant next year. It will have the capacity to produce 20 million gallons of ethanol and methanol a year.
Verenium will use a combination of acid pretreatments, enzymes, and two types of bacteria to make ethanol from the plant matter--called bagasse--that's left over from processing sugarcane to make sugar. It will also process what's called energy cane, a relative of sugarcane that's lower in sugar and higher in fiber. The high fiber content allows the plants to grow taller, increasing yield from a given plot of land.
Cane bagasse largely consists of bundles of cellulose that are surrounded by hemicellulose. Cellulose is made of long chains of glucose, a six-carbon sugar of the type usually fermented to make ethanol from sources such as corn. Hemicellulose, however, is made of five-carbon sugars, which typically can't be fermented using the same organisms as glucose. One of the things that makes Verenium's process novel, says John Malloy, the company's executive vice president, is its ability to ferment sugars from both cellulose and hemicellulose.
The process begins when the cane is ground up and cooked under high pressure with a mild acid to hydrolyze the hemicellulose and separate it from the cellulose. The five-carbon sugars in hemicellulose are then fermented using genetically modified E. coli. The cellulose is broken down with enzymes and fermented with another type of bacteria called Klebsiella oxytoca. This bacteria does double duty, since it also produces enzymes that break down cellulose, reducing the amount of enzymes from outside sources by 50 percent. The dilute ethanol produced from fermentation of both types of sugar is then distilled to make fuel.
In addition to opening the demonstration plant, Verenium is also starting to grow energy cane and to work with local farmers to ensure a steady stream of material for its planned commercial plants. Short term, the company says that it can rely on leftover bagasse from sugar production, but eventually it will draw on energy cane grown specifically to make ethanol. Provisions in the Farm Bill, which was recently passed by the United States Congress, will help by providing farmers with incentives to plant energy crops, says Carlos Riva, Verenium's CEO. The incentives are important because it takes two to three years for energy cane, a perennial plant, to become established and reach ideal production levels. As a result, farmers will need to start planting the crops next year, before commercial plants are built and there is a market for these crops.
The opening of the demonstration plant, and the current construction of a number of other demonstration- and commercial-scale cellulosic ethanol plants, marks a turning point for the industry, Riva says. The development of improved enzymes and fermentation organisms means that no further scientific breakthroughs are needed to make cellulosic ethanol commercially successful, he says. "There's been a tremendous amount of background work in science and technology development," he says. "We've learned so much about the process that the really important thing now is to start to deploy the technology at a commercial scale."
Upcoming Events
EmTech08
MIT Campus, Cambridge, MA
Tuesday,
September 23, 2008 - Thursday, September 25, 2008
http://www.technologyreview.com/emtech/08/
NSTI NanoTech 2008
Boston, MA
Sunday, June 01,
2008 - Thursday, June 05, 2008
http://www.nsti.org/Nanotech2008/
MITX What's Next Forum & Technology
Awards
Cambridge, MA
Tuesday, June 03, 2008
http://www.mitxawards.org/technology
GSP East
Washington, DC
Monday, June 09, 2008 -
Wednesday, June 11, 2008
http://conferences.oreilly.com/gspeast
The 19th Annual Venture Capital Investing
Conference
San Francisco, CA
Tuesday, June 10, 2008 -
Thursday, June 12, 2008
http://www.ibfconferences.com/ibf/viewdetails.asp?lstconfname=221
Technology Ventures Conference
Cambridge,
England
Thursday, June 12, 2008
http://www.cutec.org/
2008 BIO International Convention
San Diego,
CA
Tuesday, June 17, 2008 - Friday, June 20, 2008
http://www.bio2008.org/
2) Energy Globe Award 2008 -
Joining Forces to Solve Environmental Problems
Press Release, Energy Globe, June 16, 2008, www.energyglobe.info
Dear Dr.
Valone! 3) New Flying Saucer Runs on
Plasma Greg
Soltis, Staff Writer, Live Science, http://www.livescience.com/technology/080612-plasma-saucer.html 12
June 2008 A flying saucer is in the works, but it didn’t come from space. It came from
Florida. Subrata Roy, an engineering professor at the University of Florida, is trying
to patent his design of a circular, spinning aircraft he dubs WEAV, short for
wingless electromagnetic air vehicle. The suggested prototype offers several advantages. It can hover and
take off vertically. With no moving parts, the WEAV should be markedly reliable.
And though his battery-powered model is only six inches across, Roy thinks a
larger craft is possible. Roy applied his experience doing U.S. Air Force-funded plasma research to develop the propulsion system devoid
of typical aircraft parts such as propellers and engines. Here is how it works:
Electrodes lining the vehicle’s surface ionize the surrounding air. This creates
plasma on the vehicle’s exterior. An electrical current sent through this plasma
generates a force that not only produces the necessary lift and momentum. It
also stabilizes the vehicle in windy conditions. Looking like a flying bundt pan, the WEAV design is partially hollow and
continuously curved. This larger surface area improves lift and control. Besides providing surveillance on Earth, Roy also envisions the craft in
other atmospheres, such as that of Saturn’s moon Titan, where high air density
and low gravity would be favorable to saucer flight. But the path from concept to production may not be smooth. Flying in Earth’s
air requires a thrust at least 10 times greater than in outer space where drag
and gravity are lower. And the plasma necessary to fly also obstructs wave
transmission used for communicating with a remote source. This doesn’t discourage Roy. “Of course the risk is huge, but so is the
payoff,” he said. “If successful, we will have an aircraft, a saucer and a
helicopter all in one embodiment.” For More Information http://www.livescience.com/php/video/player.php?video_id=310707AirplaneCrashes&plugin=f http://www.livescience.com/php/video/player.php?video_id=310707FlyingSaucer&plugin=f http://www.livescience.com/php/multimedia/imagegallery/igviewer.php?gid=203
4) BlackLight Power Inc.
Announces Commercial-Ready Alternative Energy Solution
Blacklight
Power Inc., Press Release, http://www.blacklightpower.com/ Cranbury, NJ (May 28,
2008)—BlackLight Power, Inc. today announced the successful testing of a new
energy source. The company has successfully developed a prototype power system
generating 50,000 watts of thermal power on demand. Incorporating existing
industry knowledge in chemical and power engineering, BlackLight Power (BLP) is
pursuing the immediate design and engineering of central power plants utilizing
the BlackLight Process. BLP plans on developing pilot plants with architecture
and engineering firms with anticipated delivery in approximately 12 to 18
months. The BLP process has been replicated and validated by independent
scientists and has received interest from financial institutions and power
utility plant operators around the world. BLP plans on licensing its
technologies. “If you make cheap heat, you can make cheap
electricity, and if you can make cheap electricity you can make cheap hydrogen”
says Randell Mills, Chairman, CEO, and President of BlackLight Power, Inc. “The
BlackLight Process generates enormous amounts of cheap, non-polluting heat that
will replace the thermal power in coal, oil, gas and nuclear power plants that
is then converted to electricity.” And with gasoline prices setting record after
record, BlackLight CEO Randell Mills, says the BlackLight Process is the
breakthrough we’ve all been waiting for. “The hydrogen-burning car has been
possible for decades, but there has never been a way to produce cheap hydrogen
until today. We are projecting that we will be at the scale of power
generation necessary for a power plant to replace the gasoline pumped in a day
at a station with hydrogen from water in approximately 24 months.” Dr. Shelby Brewer, former CEO of ABB Combustion
Engineering and Assistant Secretary of Energy during the Reagan Administration
remarked regarding today’s announcement “In my nearly 50 years in and around the
energy business, I’ve yet to see a breakthrough as promising as this one. When I
was studying to become a nuclear engineer in the 1960s, I never imagined I would
see a day like today.” Brewer, a current board member of BlackLight Power, added
“This breakthrough was entirely supported by private capital with no government
investment.” Michael Jordan, former CEO of Westinghouse and
current board member of BlackLight Power, says “The breakthroughs announced by
Randell Mills and his team of scientists will go down as one of the most
important advances in the field of energy in the last fifty years.” BlackLight CEO Randell Mills has released a paper
outlining the full documentation and explanation of the BlackLight Process that
is available at: http://www.blacklightpower.com/ Mills is committed to announcing all future
progress as it occurs. About BlackLight Power
BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a new
primary energy source and a new field of hydrogen chemistry with broad
commercial applications such as heating, distributed power generation, central
power generation, and motive power based on a new chemical process of releasing
the latent energy of the hydrogen atom, the BlackLight Process. For more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/ Media
Contact: Ramya Kumaraswamy Mobile: 510-316-4926 Office: 212-885-0552 ramya.kumaraswamy@hillandknowlton.com BlackLight
Process BlackLight Power,
Inc. is the pioneer of technology based on the patented process of releasing
chemical energy from hydrogen called the "BlackLight Process." BlackLight has mapped the physical
structure of electrons in atoms and molecules that has helped generate a
prospectively efficient, clean, cheap, and versatile thermal energy source. ·
BlackLight Process is a novel chemical
process causing the latent energy stored in the hydrogen atom to be
released as a new primary energy source.
·
This allows the negatively charged electron that is
otherwise in a stable orbit to move closer to the naturally attracting,
positively charged nucleus to release large amounts of
energy.
·
This patented process of releasing chemical energy from
hydrogen generates power, heat, plasma (an energetic state of matter comprising
a hot, glowing, ionized gas), light, and proprietary new compounds. ·
BlackLight Process is a breakthrough in power generation
by the invention of a solid fuel that uses conventional chemical reactions to
generate the catalyst and atomic hydrogen at high reactant
densities that in turn achieves very high power densities. ·
In principle, power plants would utilize continuous
regeneration of the solid fuel mixture using known industrial processes, and the
only consumable, the hydrogen fuel, would be obtained ultimately from water due
to the enormous net energy release relative to combustion. The catalyst causes
the hydrogen atoms to transition to lower-energy states by allowing their
electrons to fall to smaller radii around the nucleus with a release of energy
that is intermediate between chemical and nuclear energies, the primary
application is as a new primary energy source. ·
The process is also a
new field of hydrogen chemistry. Specifically, energy is
released as the electrons of hydrogen atoms are induced by a catalyst to
transition to lower-energy levels (i.e. drop to lower base orbits around each
atom's nucleus). ·
The net energy released
may be over one hundred times that of combustion of the hydrogen
fuel with power densities comparable to those of fossil fuel combustion
and nuclear power plants. ·
As hydrogen atoms and
catalyst atoms are normally found bound together as molecules or are bound in
other compositions of matter, BlackLight has invented a solid
fuel that uses conventional chemical reactions to generate the catalyst
and atomic hydrogen at high reactant densities that in turn controllably
achieves very high power densities. ·
The hydrogen fuel could
be obtained by diverting a fraction of the output energy of the process to power
the electrolysis of water into its elemental constituents. With water as the fuel, the operational
cost of BlackLight Power generators is likely to be very inexpensive. Moreover,
rather than air pollutants or radioactive waste, novel hydrogen compounds with
potential commercial applications are the by-products. Two
of the potential applications of its technology are in heating and electric
power production. The
heat-generating prototypes have shown the BlackLight Process to be potentially
competitive with existing primary generation sources over a range of scales from
micro-distributed to central power generation. The BlackLight Process thermal power source may be ideal
for interfacing with commercially available electric power generating equipment
including Sterling engines and turbines for micro-distributed and distributed
electrical applications, respectively.
On larger scales, the BlackLight technology may be well-suited for the
utility industries and could reduce or eliminate problems such as those arising
from the variable regional supply and price of fuels such as coal, natural gas,
and oil, the cost of building out a suitable supporting infrastructure and
transmission grids, and eliminate pollution, greenhouse gas emission and other
market, supply, infrastructure, or environmental adversities. Commercial-scale devices demonstrating means of extracting
the energy have been operated in batch mode at BlackLight. BlackLight envisions the scale-up of
energy devices to commercial power generation levels will require the
application of existing industry knowledge in chemical and power engineering,
and not new technology breakthroughs. BlackLight Process experimental
results on its process and compositions of matter are published widely and have
been replicated by independent groups. BlackLight Power,
Inc. BlackLight Power, Inc. is the inventor of a
paradigm-shifting new primary energy source and a new field of hydrogen
chemistry with broad commercial applications.
BlackLight Power has invented a new primary energy source
with applications to heating, distributed power generation, central power
generation, and motive power based on a new chemical process of releasing the
latent energy of the hydrogen atom, the BlackLight
Process. BlackLight Power, Inc.'s wholly owned subsidiary,
Millsian, Inc., is dedicated to developing new molecular modeling applications
based on The Grand Unified Theory of Classical Physics (GUT-CP), a revolutionary
approach to solving atomic and molecular structures that uses the solved
structure of electrons for the first time.
BlackLight has built an extensive patent portfolio
worldwide and will license companies to use commercial processes and systems
that it develops in power, heating, lighting, chemical, and laser products as
described by its licensing strategy. BlackLight occupies a 53,000 square foot modern research
and development facility equipped with over 10 million dollars worth of
laboratory equipment. Its technical core competencies are theoretical physics,
chemical engineering, chemical and material characterization, thermal power
measurement, characterization of plasma processes, and power engineering. In
addition to its Cranbury facility, BlackLight has collaborating labs worldwide.
Senior management and members of the board of BlackLight
Power Inc. are as follows: For
more information, please visit http://www.blacklightpower.com/
5) Uncle Sam Needs to Solve the
Energy Crisis Jeffrey D. Sachs, Time, May 29, 2008
(June 9 issue) http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1810308,00.html We Need a
Power Surge Consumers
can buy only so many fluorescent bulbs. To solve the global energy crisis, Uncle
Sam needs to step in. The key to heading off
devastating climate change--and to sidestepping out-of-sight oil prices along
the way--is to improve technology. We need good alternatives to fossil fuels,
not the ersatz variety in which we convert corn to ethanol and then face soaring
food prices. We need to harness vast amounts of solar power and start storing
the carbon dioxide emitted by coal-fired power plants underground. We need green
buildings that demand less energy for heating and cooling, and automobiles that
get vastly more miles per gallon. These are all achievable goals. The technologies are within reach. Yet to
take them from the research phase into widespread use will require major
investments, both public and private. When it comes to climate change, President
George W. Bush's greatest failure is that he dithered for eight years instead of
investing in new technologies for a sustainable planet. Bush will have been in the Oval Office for almost as long as it took NASA to
answer John F. Kennedy's call to send a man to the moon and back. In Bush's
first term, he announced plans for a new type of coal-fired power plant that
captures its carbon dioxide exhaust and pumps it safely underground, where it
cannot affect the climate. Yet not only will he leave the White House without
having broken ground on a zero-emissions power plant, but his Administration
once again put off the initiative in January. Why? Persistent failure to think
through the project. The government has been equally deficient when it comes to bringing
energy-efficient automobiles into the mainstream. In his 2003 State of the Union
address, Bush praised the concept of hydrogen-powered cars that emit no carbon
dioxide. Yet there has been little follow-through on hydrogen or other
long-mileage technologies. And the government has done little to help advance
existing technologies like hybrids. One sign of Washington's torpor was the
decision in December 2007 to raise fuel-economy standards to 35 m.p.g. by 2020.
Not too impressive a goal, considering that today's hybrids already exceed 40
m.p.g. And new plug-in hybrids, like the Chevrolet Volt prototype that GM had up
and running in April, should get 100 m.p.g. by 2010--and they could get even
better mileage as electric batteries improve. An important measure of the government's technology commitment is the federal
budget for energy research and development. According to the International
Energy Agency, U.S. spending for all energy research--nuclear, wind, coal,
solar, biofuels, etc.--was a meager $3.2 billion in 2006. The Pentagon spends
that much in about 40 hours. Spending on carbon capture and sequestration was a
mere $67 million. At the start of the next Administration, it will be high time to increase our
annual energy-research budget to $30 billion, which would make it at least
comparable to what we spend on medical research each year at the National
Institutes of Health (NIH). And I propose, with the same sense of mission that
gave rise to NASA and NIH, that we create a National Institutes of Sustainable
Technology. A return to America's can-do attitude of the 1960s would help make
the U.S. a winner in countless ways. We would help put a brake on our
contribution to climate change, lower America's dependence on the tumultuous
Middle East and reclaim our competitive edge in science, technology and the
global economy. So, what can we do besides drive less and use fluorescent bulbs? For
starters, we should keep the presidential candidates focused not on the merits
of temporary tax cuts on gasoline but on how the U.S. can marshal its resources
to tackle our biggest environmental and geopolitical problems. Which candidate
will successfully guide our generation's "moon shot" to achieve sustainable
energy, food and water for the planet?
6) Plug-in Hybrid Catches
Fire Earlier this month, a plug-in hybrid caught on fire. In May, another one had suffered a "meltdown" of the battery pack. In
both cases, no one was hurt. But some advocates of the technology are worried
that, because of the incidents, plug-ins will get a bad name, and potential
buyers will steer clear. They shouldn't be worried. Plug-in hybrids are like ordinary hybrids, but they have bigger battery packs
that can be recharged by plugging them in. That gives cars extended electric
range compared with conventional hybrids, which cuts down on gas consumption.
Plug-ins are all the rage these days with politicians and automakers, in
whose minds they have apparently supplanted hydrogen fuel-cell vehicles as the
cars of the future. It seems unlikely that the recent incidents will do much to
change this. Both cars were aftermarket conversions of conventional hybrids.
Cars designed from the ground up as plug-in hybrids aren't available yet. So the
incidents throw into question the skill of those who did the conversions; the
incidents don't suggest that plug-in hybrids are, in principle, a bad idea. There might have been more cause for concern if the fire were the result of
the battery cells. One of the conversions reportedly used battery cells from a company enlisted to supply batteries for plug-in hybrids from
GM. It wouldn't look good if the batteries that GM intends to use started
going up in flames. But apparently, the batteries weren't the problem in either case. The fire
and meltdown seem to have been caused by the electronics used in the
conversions. One hopes that offerings from major auto companies will be better
put together. Right now, GM engineers are rushing to develop the GM Volt, a type of plug-in
hybrid that's supposed to be available by the end of 2010. If those start
bursting into flames after they roll off the assembly line, that would indeed be
bad news for the future of plug-in hybrids. You are not a physicist or an engineer, so how did you get involved in
solar energy? It was in 1986. I was the spokesman on nuclear disarmament for the Social
Democrats in the German parliament. This was at the time of Ronald Reagan's Star
Wars, the Strategic Defense Initiative or SDI. I wrote a book called The
Liberation from the Bomb, a strategy for global nuclear disarmament. That
included ending our dependence on nuclear energy, so I had to think about energy
alternatives. I had not read a single book on renewable energy. I just did my own thinking
and I wrote a chapter suggesting a new SDI, the Solar Development
Initiative. So you began with political objectives? Yes. But while my book got good reviews, the main criticisms were about my
solar proposals. The experts said I should stick to things I understood. So I
made myself an expert, and my gut feelings were right. A large proportion of
Germany's electricity could be generated from the sun, and the barriers to
achieving this are political, not economic or technological. What did you do about it? Ten years ago, I called for a programme to install You are very critical of the Kyoto protocol. Why? The protocol starts from the premise that the solutions to climate change
will be an economic burden. So it is all about how we share this burden. But it
is not an economic burden; it is a new economic opportunity. So I don't accept
the idea of issuing emission rights that can be traded. It is like giving rights
to trade in drugs, and saying drug dealers can buy and sell those rights. But you can't make all carbon dioxide emissions illegal, can you? No. But this is an ethical question. It is not normal in civilised societies
to dump household waste in the street. You pay for it to be taken away. But with
energy emissions we are allowed to dump our waste in the atmosphere. I was the only person to vote against the What technologies should be part of that revolution? You pushed through
tax exemptions for biofuels in Germany, but many people are now having second
thoughts. Biofuels are a delicate problem. It is a mistake simply to replace fossil
fuels with biofuels without ensuring the sustainability of the agricultural
system that produces them. Is there enough land to supply both food and energy? Yes, but it all depends on how things are done. It is a great mistake to
think about growing biofuels only from the few plants that provide food. You
couldn't go about it in a worse way than trying to turn corn into ethanol, as
the US is doing. The first step should be to make use of residues from food production. Ninety
per cent of the biomass, like straw, is not used for food. Refining it to make
biofuels would provide a second income for farmers, and the waste from
biorefineries, like ash, could be used to replace chemical fertilisers. In this
integrated system, biofuels would be the basis for organic agriculture and there
would be no competition for land between food and fuel. Don't these changes in energy technology require changes in the way our
society is organised? To take advantage of this integrated system, we have to have localised energy
production, near the farms. Solar and wind power is also best provided locally.
This is completely different from the fossil fuel energy system, where
production and consumption are separate - often on opposite sides of the world -
and you need a huge amount of infrastructure to link them up. The German government is talking about sticking with fossil fuels like
coal, but capturing and burying the emissions. Isn't this a practical low-carbon
solution? I believe it is a fake. Carbon capture is technologically but not
economically feasible. It reduces energy efficiency, because of the energy
needed to capture the carbon dioxide and run the extra infrastructure. And at
the end, you still have the problem of making sure the carbon stays safely in
storage for thousands of years. It is like the problem with nuclear waste,
possibly even worse. Today, this idea is being used as a justification for building new coal-fired
power stations, with the promise that in maybe 15 years the carbon could be
captured. These promises won't be fulfilled. In any case, carbon capture would
cost much more than renewables, so why bother? People talk about introducing a low-carbon economy. I don't like that term.
It is a way to smuggle in nuclear power generation and carbon capture. We should
talk instead about a renewable energy economy. There is plenty of renewable
energy for all our needs. Many environmentalists are pessimists and don't believe in technical
fixes. But you are a real techno-optimist. Yes, because I see the opportunities for renewables. I see that they can
provide 100 per cent of our energy, and they can be introduced very fast. All
the great technological revolutions happen much more quickly than even the
experts and enthusiasts guess. The forecasts for the spread of cellphones and IT
were all overtaken by the reality. The renewables revolution will be the
same. The IT and mobile phone revolutions were also the first technological
revolutions in modern times that were not about centralising power. They were
about decentralising. And this will happen to energy from renewables. The big
old-fashioned power stations and long supply chains will be replaced by local
supplies for local markets. This is changing the tide of history. How is your house powered? By a solar panel. My roof produces more power than I need myself. Energy and Fuels - Learn more about the looming energy crisis in
our comprehensive special
report. Born in 1944, Hermann Scheer studied economics and social science, becoming
involved in revolutionary student politics at the University of Heidelberg where
he was president of the student parliament. He taught economics at the Technical
University in Stuttgart before becoming a systems analyst at the German Nuclear
Research Centre. In 1980 he was elected as a member of parliament, and has
remained an MP ever since. He is president of the European Association for
Renewable Energy, and chairman of the World Council for
Renewable Energy, both of which he founded. His books include The Solar Economy (Earthscan, 2002) and Energy Autonomy (Earthscan, 2006)
8) The 14th International Conference on
In 1989,
two chemists announced that they could produce nuclear reactions and
thermal energy under ordinary conditions of temperature and pressure using
electrochemistry. They were Martin Fleischmann and Stanley Pons. The
reactions were termed “cold fusion”, even though no one really knew then
with confidence that nuclear reactions were occurring. Their novel
experimental results were at odds with hot fusion data and were not
supported by theory. Many scientists concluded that there were no nuclear
reactions and the reported experiments were in error. In fact, cold fusion
became a widely-known and still-cited example of science gone wrong. Condensed
Matter Nuclear Science, originally known as cold fusion, has been studied
by hundreds of scientists globally since the field began in 1989. At this
time, the experimental evidence for the ability to induce nuclear
reactions at low energies and temperatures is very strong. Further, many
of the characteristics of the reactions and their products are already
known. Measurement techniques and results obtained with them have been
published in over 1000 scientific papers, many of them in refereed
journals. The mechanisms for the nuclear reactions are not yet understood.
Nevertheless, the empirical information shows that they produce energy
with harmless helium as the primary by-product. In most experiments, there
is neither significant immediate radiation nor residual radioactivity.
Several start-up companies in the US, and many other academic, government
and industrial organizations world-wide, are working on the science of
nuclear reactions, in which a solid lattice plays a central role. The
emerging results might provide the basis for green energy sources with
many applications, such as the production of clean drinking
water. Goals
and Topics ICCF-14
will be a scientific conference, so its primary goal is the presentation,
discussion and publication of techniques and results relevant to the
Fleischmann-Pons Effect. The conference will provide a means for active
participants in the field to contribute to its advancement. Another major
goal is to provide reviews and new results for people who are considering
participation in the field, or who are simply interested in the scientific
status and possibilities offered by this highly interdisciplinary and
challenging field. Topics
for conference papers include, but are not limited to the following
subjects: The Conference Agenda is the responsibility of
the Technical Program Committe
Dr. David Nagel, Professor, Electrical Engineering, George
Washington University, Conference Coordinator, ICCF-14,
2008
We invite you to participate in the Energy Globe 2008.
The
Energy Globe Award is today's most important environmental award
worldwide.
The Award distinguishes projects that sustainably use our
resources such as
water, earth, energy and air or use renewable energy
forms. This makes a
significant contribution to climate and environment.
Only if such harbinger
projects are followed by many other projects can
climate change be slowed.
The Energy Globe is awarded nationally and internationally in the
categories earth, fire, water, air and youth. You will find details about
possible projects on the back of the application form.
The first
prize in each category of the international Energy Globe Award
wins ?10,000.
Awards are made in a televised gala that is viewed worldwide.
Let us
join forces to solve our environmental problems!
Your submission helps
to introduce successful projects worldwide that can
also be implemented in
other locations - and the sum of many small
contributions amounts to a huge
contribution!
All submitted projects are documented in the Energy Globe
Database at:
www.energyglobe.info
We invite you to participate. Every project, large
or small, is welcome.
We look forward to your project. All further
informaton concerning your
participation you will find at www.energyglobe.info!
Please send your project documents by 21 July 2008 to:
Energy Globe, Mühlbach 7, 4801 Traunkirchen, Austria
or online to:
contact@energyglobe.info.
Additional information and the application form for download are available
at:
www.energyglobe.info.
Kind regards,
Christoph
Winterbacher
Project Manager
ENERGY GLOBE
Mühlbach 7
A-4801
Traunkirchen
Telefon: +43 (0) 76 17 / 2090 31
Telefax: +43 (0)
76 17 / 2090 90
e-Mail: christoph.winterbacher@geg-werbung.at
www.energyglobe.info
Applications
7) Interview: Bring on the Solar Revolution
Profile
Related Articles
Weblinks
Condensed Matter Nuclear
Science
http://www.iccf-14.org/
Background
Information
9) World Future Society Conference to be Held in Washington DC July 26-28, 2008
World Future Society Press Release, June, 2008, http://www.wfs.org/2008mtaschedule.htm
Conference Theme: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes
Dear Colleagues:
I will never forget attending my first World Future Society annual conference. It was the summer of 1996 in Washington, D.C. The opening keynote speaker was former Colorado governor Dick Lamm, who was rumored to be considering a run for the presidency of the United States. Lamm was as prescient as ever, having nailed the aging and health crisis that was already on the horizon and would soon be the challenge of public policy wonks for years to come.
It was heady times, and what I remember most was the sheer excitement of seeing hundreds of people from all over the world engaged in serious debates about the future. The Hilton bustled with scientists, economists, historians, philosophers, business people, academics, teachers, ordinary people debating and presenting new ideas about the social, political, economic, and technological trends and events for the next hundred years.
I was like a child in a candy store. I attended sessions from morning until late at night before catching the last train out of D.C. to carry me back to the home of a friend who lived in Maryland. By the time I left D.C.—having been a guest of the Professional Members' Forum—I knew my life had been changed and that there was no way I would ever miss another meeting of the World Future Society.
I had seen the future through a new set of lenses.
So why am I writing this letter? Because as chair of the 2008 meeting, I encourage you to join hundreds of others who will gather in D.C. to explore the future through new eyes.
Futurists are loath to make predictions but I am going to go out on a limb to make one exception. If you attend WorldFuture 2008: Seeing the Future Through New Eyes, July 26-28, 2008, in Washington, D.C., you will not regret it!
Looking forward to seeing you this summer.
Nat Irvin, II Nat Irvin, II Conference Chair |
Download a
PDF file of the preliminary program
WorldFuture
2008:Seeing the Future Through New Eyes
July 26-28, 2008 • Hilton Washington • Washington,
D.C.
Preconference Courses: July 25
Professional Members' Forum: July 29,
2008
Provided as a public service by www.IntegrityResearchInstitute.org where you can still request a FREE copy of the 1/2 hour presentation by Dr. Valone on "Progress in Future Energy" and buy other energy-related publications not available anywhere else!