|
Dear
Subscriber,
A
future energy sensation this month is an
intriguing set of spiral gradient magnetic motor
demonstrations on YouTube. It has reawakened my
interest in this project after publishing a
physics paper two years ago on the topic. Calloway
Engines teaches how to make it http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kCr3lOhMJCg&NR=1
from a skateboard wheel and a 2" x 1/4" bar magnet
stator and has a great website to show his history
of development that parallels IRI documented
research: http://www.callowayengines.com/.
With some more due diligence, the V Track Motor
may be the one to watch. Following up
on last month's story about China, we find another
interesting cooperative wind power article that
demonstrates international diplomacy where it
really counts...with the environment (story #5).
Also to ethically compare fossil fuels and OPEC
world dominance (story #4) with smaller, modular
nuclear power (story #2), here are two articles
for the reader to make a sustainable choice for
the future. Also, the upcoming issue of
Superconsciousness magazine will feature an
article of ours on "How Energy Medicine will Save
Healthcare" (story #3). We
have also finalized our speaker list for the
upcoming COFE4 (March 15, 2011) http://www.integrityresearchinstitute.org/cofe.html
. Mark your calendars for a great future energy
event and expo! Lastly, if you would like to see
my contributed interview (besides the brief Oct.
28th appearance) to the unusual topic of "Ancient
Aliens" on the History Channel, featuring a 500 kV
Tesla coil, it will air at 10 PM Eastern time,
this Thursday, December 2nd which is also supposed
to reference my book, Harnessing the Wheelwork of
Nature: Tesla's Science of Energy on the show.
Should be interesting.
Thomas Valone,
PhD, PE Editor www.IntegrityResearchInstitute.org
| |
| |
1) Graphene
Under Strain Creates Gigantic Pseudo-Magnetic
Fields |
Paul Preuss
510-486-6249 paul_preuss@lbl.gov
Graphene,
the extraordinary form of carbon that consists of
a single layer of carbon atoms, has produced
another in a long list of experimental surprises.
In the July 30, 2010 issue of the journal
Science, a multi-institutional team of
researchers headed by Michael Crommie, a faculty
senior scientist in the Materials Sciences
Division at the U.S. Department of Energy's
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and a
professor of physics at the University of
California at Berkeley, reports the creation of
pseudo-magnetic fields far stronger than the
strongest magnetic fields ever sustained in a
laboratory - just by putting the right kind of
strain onto a patch of graphene
"We
have shown experimentally that when graphene is
stretched to form nanobubbles on a platinum
substrate, electrons behave as if they were
subject to magnetic fields in excess of 300 tesla,
even though no magnetic field has actually been
applied," says Crommie. "This is a completely new
physical effect that has no counterpart in any
other condensed matter system."
Crommie
notes that "for over 100 years people have been
sticking materials into magnetic fields to see how
the electrons behave, but it's impossible to
sustain tremendously strong magnetic fields in a
laboratory setting." The current record is 85
tesla for a field that lasts only thousandths of a
second. When stronger fields are created, the
magnets blow themselves apart.
The
ability to make electrons behave as if they were
in magnetic fields of 300 tesla or more - just by
stretching graphene - offers a new window on a
source of important applications and fundamental
scientific discoveries going back over a century.
This is made possible by graphene's electronic
behavior, which is unlike any other
material's.
A
carbon atom has four valence electrons; in
graphene (and in graphite, a stack of graphene
layers), three electrons bond in a plane with
their neighbors to form a strong hexagonal
pattern, like chicken-wire. The fourth electron
sticks up out of the plane and is free to hop from
one atom to the next. The latter pi-bond electrons
act as if they have no mass at all, like photons.
They can move at almost one percent of the speed
of light.
The
idea that a deformation of graphene might lead to
the appearance of a pseudo-magnetic field first
arose even before graphene sheets had been
isolated, in the context of carbon nanotubes
(which are simply rolled-up graphene). In early
2010, theorist Francisco Guinea of the Institute
of Materials Science of Madrid and his colleagues
developed these ideas and predicted that if
graphene could be stretched along its three main
crystallographic directions, it would effectively
act as though it were placed in a uniform magnetic
field. This is because strain changes the bond
lengths between atoms and affects the way
electrons move between them. The pseudo-magnetic
field would reveal itself through its effects on
electron orbits.
In
classical physics, electrons in a magnetic field
travel in circles called cyclotron orbits. These
were named following Ernest Lawrence's invention
of the cyclotron, because cyclotrons continuously
accelerate charged particles (protons, in
Lawrence's case) in a curving path induced by a
strong field.
Viewed
quantum mechanically, however, cyclotron orbits
become quantized and exhibit discrete energy
levels. Called Landau levels, these correspond to
energies where constructive interference occurs in
an orbiting electron's quantum wave function. The
number of electrons occupying each Landau level
depends on the strength of the field - the
stronger the field, the more energy spacing
between Landau levels, and the denser the electron
states become at each level - which is a key
feature of the predicted pseudo-magnetic fields in
graphene.
A
serendipitous discovery
Describing
their experimental discovery, Crommie says, "We
had the benefit of a remarkable stroke of
serendipity.
Crommie's
research group had been using a scanning tunneling
microscope to study graphene monolayers grown on a
platinum substrate. A scanning tunneling
microscope works by using a sharp needle probe
that skims along the surface of a material to
measure minute changes in electrical current,
revealing the density of electron states at each
point in the scan while building an image of the
surface.
Crommie
was meeting with a visiting theorist from Boston
University, Antonio Castro Neto, about a
completely different topic when a group member
came into his office with the latest data.
"It
showed nanobubbles, little pyramid-like
protrusions, in a patch of graphene on the
platinum surface," Crommie says, "and associated
with the graphene nanobubbles there were distinct
peaks in the density of electron states."
rommie
says his visitor, Castro Neto, took one look and
said, "That looks like the Landau levels predicted
for strained graphene."
Sure
enough, close examination of the triangular
bubbles revealed that their chicken-wire lattice
had been stretched precisely along the three axes
needed to induce the strain orientation that
Guinea and his coworkers had predicted would give
rise to pseudo-magnetic fields. The greater the
curvature of the bubbles, the greater the strain,
and the greater the strength of the
pseudo-magnetic field. The increased density of
electron states revealed by scanning tunneling
spectroscopy corresponded to Landau levels, in
some cases indicating giant pseudo-magnetic fields
of 300 tesla or more.
Getting
the right strain resulted from a combination of
factors," Crommie says. "To grow graphene on the
platinum we had exposed the platinum to ethylene"
- a simple compound of carbon and hydrogen - "and
at high temperature the carbon atoms formed a
sheet of graphene whose orientation was determined
by the platinum's lattice structure."
o
get the highest resolution from the scanning
tunneling microscope, the system was then cooled
to a few degrees above absolute zero. Both the
graphene and the platinum contracted - but the
platinum shrank more, with the result that excess
graphene pushed up into bubbles, measuring four to
10 nanometers (billionths of a meter) across and
from a third to more than two nanometers high.
To
confirm that the experimental observations were
consistent with theoretical predictions, Castro
Neto worked with Guinea to model a nanobubble
typical of those found by the Crommie group. The
resulting theoretical picture was a near-match to
what the experimenters had observed: a
strain-induced pseudo-magnetic field some 200 to
400 tesla strong in the regions of greatest
strain, for nanobubbles of the correct size.
Controlling
where electrons live and how they move is an
essential feature of all electronic devices," says
Crommie. "New types of control allow us to create
new devices, and so our demonstration of strain
engineering in graphene provides an entirely new
way for mechanically controlling electronic
structure in graphene. The effect is so strong
that we could do it at room temperature."
The
opportunities for basic science with strain
engineering are also huge. For example, in strong
pseudo-magnetic fields electrons orbit in tight
circles that bump up against one another,
potentially leading to novel electron-electron
interactions. Says Crommie, "this is the kind of
physics that physicists love to explore."
"Strain-induced
pseudo-magnetic fields greater than 300 tesla in
graphene nanobubbles," by Niv Levy, Sarah Burke,
Kacey Meaker, Melissa Panlasigui, Alex Zettl,
Francisco Guinea, Antonio Castro Neto, and Michael
Crommie, appears in the July 30, 2010 issue of
Science and is available online to
subscribers. The work was supported by the
Department of Energy's Office of Science and by
the Office of Naval Research.
Additional
information
Lawrence
Berkeley National Laboratory provides solutions to
the world's most urgent scientific challenges
including clean energy, climate change, human
health, novel materials, and a better
understanding of matter and force in the universe.
It is a world leader in improving our lives and
knowledge of the world around us through
innovative science, advanced computing, and
technology that makes a difference. Berkeley Lab
is a U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) national
laboratory managed by the University of California
for the DOE Office of Science. Visit our website
back to table of
contents |
2) Smaller,
Simpler, Safer Nuclear Plant will Cost Less, Come
on Line Sooner. |
CORVALLIS,
Ore. (June 17, 2010) Press Release
http://www.nuscalepower.com/nr-News-NuScale.php
NuScale
Power has designed an NSSS and nuclear power plant
that offers the benefits of nuclear power but
takes away the issues presented by installing
large capacity.
The
NuScale design is for a modular, scalable Light
Water Reactor nuclear power plant system. An NPP
using NuScale's standardized design produces 540
MWe powered by 12 NuScale integral PWR
modules. Each NuScale module produces 45 MWe and
has its own combined containment vessel and
reactor system, and its own
designated turbine-generator set.
NuScale power plants are scalable - additional
modules are added as customer demand for
electricity increases. These multi-module plants
are highly reliable - one unit can be taken out of
service for refueling or maintenance, or a new
unit added, without affecting the operation of the
others.
Smaller,
simpler, safer nuclear plant will cost less, come
on line sooner.
Capturing
"the economies of small" is pivotal in our
nation's effort to re-establish itself as an
international leader in the construction of
nuclear power plants, NuScale Power's Chief
Financial Officer Jay Surina asserted Monday at
the Mid-America Regulatory Conference.
"The
NuScale power plant takes advantage of simplicity
of design, modularity and smaller size to improve
the economics of both construction and operation,"
Surina stated. "This will help overcome the
regulatory and financial hurdles impeding the
construction of much larger plants."
Surina
explained that NuScale's modular design comprising
up to 12 small reactors means less up-front risk
and cost. Utilities can order plants that can be
scaled up to meet their demand requirements over
time. And, smaller plants can reach many markets
the large, conventional plants can't serve due to
small loads and transmission unavailability.
He
said the NuScale design has moved into the
forefront of efforts to license and build a
smaller nuclear power plant. This is largely
because the design has been confirmed under
operating temperature and pressure at a test
facility located at Oregon State University. It is
the only small scale modular reactor design to be
so tested. This should speed the review and
approval process required by the Nuclear
Regulatory Commission (NRC), he added.
A
naturally cooled, light water reactor that
eliminates pumps, pipes, tanks and other
components required by its much larger
counterparts is both safer and easier to build,
Surina said. Our domestic supply chain can provide
all of the required components, reducing cost and
providing jobs. NuScale Power, headquartered
in Corvallis, Ore., anticipates filing a Design
Certification Application with the NRC early in
2012. A plant could be in operation as soon as
2018.
RELATED
NEWS
-
NuScale Power Chief Executive Officer Paul
Lorenzini today announced that Edward G. Wallace
has accepted the position of Senior Vice President
for Regulatory Affairs with the company.
"We
are extremely pleased that Ed has agreed to lead
our efforts to license our modular, scalable
nuclear technology and power plant design,"
Lorenzini said. "He brings a wealth of experience
in regulatory affairs and in virtually every
aspect of the nuclear power industry."
Wallace
will direct the submission to the NRC of an
application for design certification of NuScale's
small, modular, scalable, natural circulation
light water reactor. The company expects to submit
the application in 2012 with the goal of
supporting a plant on line as early as 2018.
Wallace
was the founder and president of GNBC, a
consulting firm on nuclear power and electric
utility issues based in Chattanooga, TN. Since
2004 he filled the role of Senior General Manager
- US Programs - PBMR Pty, Ltd. where he was
responsible for the development and delivery of
PBMR programs in the US including US Nuclear
Regulatory Commission design certification. PBMR
Pty Ltd, based in South Africa, is the developer
of an advanced, small, standardized nuclear power
plant for global markets.
Wallace
has played key roles in a wide range of activities
in the nuclear industry, including work on
licensing the pebble bed modular reactor for
Exelon and the direction of the merger of PECO
Energy and Unicom nuclear organizations. Among his
responsibilities at Tennessee Valley Authority,
beginning in 1990, was senior manager, licensing
and regulatory affairs. From 1996-1999 he was
general manager, Service Contracts, where he
directed all of TVA's labor and service
contracting policies and practices. A graduate
of the U.S, Naval Academy, Wallace served as a
nuclear submarine officer. He holds a master of
business administration degree from University of
Tennessee,
Chattanooga.
|
3) How
Energy Medicine will Save Health
Care! |
Therapeutic use of
electromagnetism has ancient roots, and was first
introduced into the US by Hahnemann just prior
to 1800. At first, only direct current (DC)
devices were utilized in the medical doctor's
office for relieving pain and vibrating female
patients who were routinely diagnosed with
"hysteria." In 1865, however, Maxwell's equations
established electromagnetism as the second
universal force, which become a central player in
quantum chemistry, more recently described as
"controlling all chemical reactions, including
life itself".[i]
In
1898, the father of AC electricity, Nikola Tesla,
stated correctly at an annual meeting of the
American Electro-Therapeutic Association[ii] that bodily "tissues are
condensers" and part of an equivalent circuit only
recently developed for the human body.[iii] In fact the body's
tissues are excellent electrical insulators, with
an inherent compatibility toward the presence of
high voltage electric fields.[iv] The electrical field
across every cell membrane is therefore a
distributed storage battery of energy throughout
the human body...the so-called "body
electric."
The
decline in the use of energy medicine can be
traced to the book-length Flexner report in 1910,
which declared electromagnetism "irregular
science" purging its teaching from medical
curricula, was published under the aegis of the
Carnegie Foundation. Many aspects of the
present-day American medical profession stem from
the Flexner Report and its aftermath.
Flexner clearly doubted the
scientific validity of all forms of medicine other
than allopathic biomedicine, deeming any approach
to medicine that did not advocate the use of
treatments such as vaccines to prevent and cure
illness as tantamount to quackery and
charlatanism. Medical schools that offered
training in various disciplines including eclectic
medicine, physiomedicalism, naturopathy, and
homeopathy, were told either to drop these courses
from their curriculum or lose their accreditation
and underwriting support. The aftermath of such a
narrow approach to healthcare is still felt today
with almost half of all Americans taking at least
one prescription drug.
As a result, today, doctors
aren't taught biophysics or electromedicine in
medical school so they simply don't know the
extent of the multifaceted biological landscape of
the body. Furthermore, the financial
infrastructure of healthcare has evolved in the
past century away from being patient-centric.
Therefore, more expensive innovation, such as MRI
testing machines that generates income to the
healthcare delivery system, is the only type of
electrical technology familiar to
doctors.
However, today there is a strong interest
in energy medicine that can save healthcare.
Recently labeled "Star Trek Medicine"[i], the devices do not have
the usual monthly expenditures to administer daily
doses. Another is that light
therapy, such as laser light, seems to enhance
stem cell activity, even to the extent of
reversing diabetes, according to a source from
Thailand. Health practitioner Ryn Raevis and her
patient gave lectures at the 2003 Tesla Science
Conference and Expo sponsored by Integrity
Research Institute (DVDs available) where they
both described the remarkable reversal of a
gangrene leg on the patient with several days of
treatment with a professional pair of
electrotherapy devices, when conventional doctors
repeatedly offered amputation as the only
solution. The same devices also have reduced
rehabilitation time by 65% in clinical trials. The
patient is still walking with both legs today,
without any recurring infection and pain-free.
Another surprising example is silver ion
therapy which can be fashioned into silvered nylon
that operates by "electrocution" on a cellular
membrane level, since silver is electrically
conductive. When applied to a laceration or even a
small cut, silvered nylon has been shown to cut
the healing time in half on the average.[i] The
good news is that colloidal silver solution also
works on infected sinuses with a nasal spray,
reversing the onset of colds and flu.
Energy medicine also uses electricity to
create the magnetic fields. In clinical trials,
osteoarthritis treated by pulsed magnetic fields
showed the treatment group improved substantially
more than the placebo group.[ii]
The applied magnetic fields act to suppress
inflammatory responses at the cell membrane
level.[iii]
Thus, even NASA conducted a study finding that the
rise time of the pulse was the most important
ingredient for effectiveness.[iv]
The late Glen Gordon, M.D. cited the NASA study
often after he designed a small pulsed magnetic
field device that he sold for a while. He also
bicycled across country afterwards to prove how
healthy the treatment had made him.[v]
At the other end of the spectrum, there are
those who think that lengthy, regular, daily
exposure of over one hour per day to
electromagnetic fields from cell phones near the
head are detrimental. This has been confirmed in
the most recent findings by the INTERPHONE Study
Group.[vi]
However, the same study also found "protective"
effects that reduced the average incidence
of cancer or in other words, "apparent
protective effects at most doses".
Bioelectromagnetic healing science explains that
short term exposure to a wide range of
electromagnetic frequencies and intensities will
boost the immune system by allowing the body to
absorb a small amount of the multi-frequency
energy.[vii]
Our institute has had
great results using a high voltage device
patterned after the historical "Violet Ray" which
even today has wide applications.[i] The
PREMIER electrotherapy
device provides electrons directly to the
deep tissue layers to attack free radicals
directly, which this author has proven are the
real antioxidants that also are the active
ingredients in vitamin pills. Electrical fields
across membranes is one of only two ways the body
stores energy (the other is chemical), so everyone
feels more energetic after a short high voltage
field exposure.
More
of the history and latest developments are Bioelectromagnetic Healing: A
Rationale for Its Use.
[i] Valone, Thomas, "Bioelectromagnetics
Applications for Health and Healing", Explore
for the Professional, vol. 19, No. 3, 2010
www.explorepub.com
found in the author's
book, Bioelectromagnetic Healing: A Rationale
for Its Use.
[i] "Silver-nylon: A New Antimicrobial
Agent", Antimicrob. Agents Chemother, 23, 356,
1983
[ii] Trock, D.H., A.J. Bollet, R.H. Dyer,
Jr., L.P. Fielding, W.K. Miner, and R. Markoll.
1993. A double-blind trial of the clinical effects
of pulsed electromagnetic fields in
osteoarthritis. J. Rheumatol.
20:456-460.
[iii] O'Connor, M.E., R.H.C. Bentall, and J.C.
Monahan, eds. 1990. Emerging Electromagnetic
Medicine conference proceedings. Springer-Verlag,
New York
[iv] Goodwin, Thomas, "Physiological And
Molecular Genetic Effects Of Time-Varying
Electromagnetic Fields On Human Neuronal Cells"
NASA/TP-2003-212054, September,
2003
[vi] Cardis et al., "Brain tumour risk in
relation to mobile telephone use: results of the
INTERPHONE
international
case-control study", International
Journal of Epidemiology, V. 39, p. 675,
May 17, 2010
[vii] Valone, Thomas, Bioelectromagnetic
Healing: A Rationale for Its Use,
8th edition 2008, Integrity Research
Institute, Washington DC, ISBN
0-9641070-5-8
back to table of
contents
|
4) OPEC on
the Road to World Oil
Dominance |
Experts can't agree just
when the world's production of precious oil will
stop growing, but the authoritative International
Energy Agency (IEA) based in Paris has made an
ominous forecast. Those countries outside
the well-endowed Organization of the Petroleum
Exporting Countries (OPEC) will never produce more
oil than they are producing right now.
Alternatives for continuing the rise in the
world's oil supply are out there, IEA says in a
report released last week, but not all experts
agree that countries like Iraq, Kazakhstan, and
Venezuela will be up to the task.
For years, non-OPEC
producers have been doing nothing to increase
world oil production. Even with oil prices soaring
over the past decade and drillers in a frenzy to
cash in, non-OPEC production staggered through the
past 5 years without an increase. In the IEA's
"New Policies Scenario," the focus of this year's
outlook, countries cautiously implement announced
policies for reducing fossil fuel usage. Even so,
the stable trend of non-OPEC production continues.
"Total non-OPEC oil production is broadly constant
[in the scenario] to around 2025 ... thereafter,
production starts to drop," the report says.
The IEA makes "a good
argument" for a 20-year-long, flat-topped
production peak or plateau for non-OPEC countries,
says energy analyst Richard Nehring of Nehring
Associates in Colorado Springs, Colorado. Such a
plateau, all agree, would lead to an "increased
dependence on a small number of [OPEC] producing
countries," a dependence that "would intensify
concerns about their influence over prices," as
the report puts it.
While agreeing that
non-OPEC production has likely peaked, Nehring and
others have doubts about IEA's broader, optimistic
outlook. The IEA scenario has the world increasing
total production for the next 25 years in the face
of the non-OPEC plateau and decline. To do that,
three kinds of oil will have to perform well
during the next quarter century, Nehring notes.
Production of conventional crude oil-the kind that
flows out of a well pretty much on its own-will
have to remain constant. The IEA report says that
big increases will make that possible-coming from
places like Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Brazil, and
Kazakhstan. Nehring questions the size of the
projected Saudi increase and notes the
difficulties major oil companies have doing
business in Kazakhstan.
Production of natural gas
liquids, the hydrocarbons that condense from
natural gas, will have to expand, too. Nehring
sees no innate obstacle there, as natural gas use
is widely expected to increase. And unconventional
oil production-mainly from Venezuela's heavy oil
deposits and Canada's oil sands-will have to
expand considerably. Developing Canada's oil sands
is an environmentally touchy operation, and
Venezuela has been unfriendly of late to the
foreign oil companies that are needed to increase
production, Nehring notes.
All in all, nothing in the
IEA outlook dissuades Nehring from his
middle-of-the-road view that it will be hard to
avoid a peak in world oil production by 2030 or
so, just 20 years from now. But whatever the fate
of world production, OPEC and especially Middle
East producers are quickly taking the driver's
seat.
Bact to table of
contents |
5) Wind
Power Projects Shows how US and China Can Get
Along |
Kevin Bullis,
Technology Review, Thursday, November 18,
2010 http://www.technologyreview.com/energy/26753/?nlid=3793 Even
as a trade dispute puts the countries at odds,
some are finding ways to work together.
But even as the United
Steelworkers union was formulating its complaint,
it was working on an agreement that would clear
the way for the proposed Texas wind farm to
continue-an agreement that suggests how China and
the United States can work together to help scale
up renewable energy production and drive down
costs.
The original plan called
for all of the wind turbines to be manufactured in
China, then
shipped to the U.S. for installation. This setup
would create thousands of jobs in China, and only
a few hundred in the United States. While most of
the financing for the project would come from
China, the project leaders made it clear that the
success of the project depended on help from the
Recovery Act-with several reports suggesting that
about 30 percent of the funding could come from
stimulus grants.
Tensions between the
United States and China were ratcheted up recently
when the Obama administration said it would
investigate complaints of unfair trade policies in
China connected
to renewable energy. But a controversial wind
farm project in Texas could offer a model for
greater cooperation. It is succeeding because the
manufacturing of hundreds of wind turbines will be
split between the two countries.
The 600-megawatt wind
project was announced last year by investors in
China and the United States. It will involve the
construction of about 300 wind turbines and will
draw on financing from both Chinese banks and from
the 2009 U.S. Recovery Act.
Several U.S. senators
cried foul about the project, complaining that
most of the jobs it would create would be in
China, where construction of the turbines would
take place. The project became a rallying point
for opposition to the stimulus bill, as the
senators called for a freeze in spending until a
new law could be passed requiring that all of the
funded renewable energy projects use equipment
manufactured in the United States.
Since then, tensions
between the United States and China over energy
projects have mounted, reaching a high point
recently when the United Steelworkers union filed
a formal complaint about government subsidies paid
to Chinese energy companies and other policies
that it said violated World Trade Organization
agreements. Last month, the Obama administration
agreed to investigate the complaint, the next step
before the matter is officially brought before the
WTO. The move drew an indignant response from
Chinese officials, who asserted that Chinese
subsidies were matched by subsidies provided by
the U.S. government.
Senator Charles Schumer
(D-New York) wrote to Energy Secretary Steven Chu,
advising him to deny any Recovery Act funds to the
project. "The idea that stimulus funds would be
used to create jobs overseas is quite troubling,
and therefore I urge you to reject any request for
stimulus money unless the high-value components,
including the wind turbines, are manufactured in
the United States," he wrote.
The project developers
responded by announcing plans to build a wind
turbine assembly plant in the United States that
will eventually create 1,000 jobs, and may supply
some of the turbines for the Texas project. Then
the United Steelworkers announced a deal with
A-Power, the Chinese contractor
and manufacturer for the project. Many turbine
parts will still be manufactured in China, but
A-Power has agreed to buy 50,000 tons of U.S.
steel for the project and make key parts of the
turbine, such as the main towers, in the United
States.
As well as mollifying the
opposition, the new assembly plant and the steel
agreement will give A-Power access to the very
large wind-power market in the U.S. Although U.S.
steel is more expensive than Chinese steel,
A-Power says that it breaks even by saving on
shipping costs from China. "The overall costs are
more or less the same," says Sun Kai, vice
president and senior accountant at Liaoning
Hi-Tech Energy Group, A-Power's parent
company.
Other Chinese wind
companies are now considering similar approaches
to accessing the U.S. wind market. For example,
Goldwind Global, one of the biggest
Chinese manufacturers, has announced it is
considering building an assembly plant in the
United States.
The agreement between the
United Steelworkers and A-Power is a model that
can be copied by other companies, says Joanna Lewis, a professor of science,
technology, and international affairs at
Georgetown University, although she notes that the
specifics of each deal-such as what parts will be
manufactured in the U.S.-will vary from company to
company. "A-Power has managed the situation well,
working with the U.S. so that both sides benefit,"
she says.
back to table of
contents |
About Integrity Research
Institute
Future Energy
eNews is provided
as a public service from Integrity Research
Institute, a Non-Profit dedicated
to educating the public on eco-friendly
emerging energy technologies.
FREE copy of the 30
minute DVD "Progress in Future Energy" is
available by sending an email
with "Free DVD" in
subject and mailing address in
body.
Your
generous support is welcome by making a tax
deductible donation on our
secure website | | | |
Save 10% |
On
all purchases from IRI by becoming
a member and
a free gift when you join and you save 10% on all
conference and workshop fees as well. You
will receive a quarterly mailing with the latest
information on eco-friendly emerging energy
technologies. All 2010 IRI members will receive a free
copy of the special Tesla Issue from Infinite
Energy Magazine and a free copy of the
"Story of Stuff" DVD by Annie Lennard as well
as a Free copy of the IRI Future Energy
Annual magazine and Free calendar at year's
end.
|
| | | |